Confirm that f and g are inverses by showing that f(g(x)) = x and g(f(x)) = x.
missing something?
Perhaps, the functions?
And why is this question posted twice? You should delete one of them.
You should have been given f(x) and g(x)
I just joined yesterday i'm sorry how would i delete one? and i have a picture
Whoa... that's nasty.
For f(g(x)) you put g(x) in wherever an x is in f(x).
i suck at inverse problems i get confused easily, mind going step by step?
\[f(g(x)) = \frac{(\frac{-5x-9}{x-1})-9}{(\frac{-5x-9}{x-1})+5}\]
ok what's the next step
@satellite73 Care to assist?
Are you sure these are inverses? Or are you supposed to DETERMINE whether they are inverses?
im supposed to Confirm that f and g are inverses by showing that f(g(x)) = x and g(f(x)) = x.
Theoretically, you should be able to set f(g(x)) = g(f(x))
Egads, I thought it wasn't working out when I tried it on paper, but it does. \[f(g(x)) = \dfrac{(\dfrac{-5x-9}{x-1})-9}{(\dfrac{-5x-9}{x-1})+5}\] \[ = \left( \dfrac{(\dfrac{-5x-9}{x-1})-9}{(\dfrac{-5x-9}{x-1})+5} \right)\frac{ x-1 }{x-1}\] \[ = \dfrac{-5x-9-9(x-1)}{-5x-9+5(x-1)} \] \[ = \dfrac{-14x}{-14}=x \]
Well, that's one direction anyway.
looks like you are doing fine
big ugly complex fraction then an orgy of cancellation and you are done will work the same way going the other direction
@satellite73 , couldn't you theoretically set them equal and then cross multiply. Then "simplify".
no
f(g(x)) = x g(f(x)) = x f(g(x)) = g(f(x)) That doesn't work? And if you get x = x then they are inverse?
ok i need to process this information, sorry i want to make sure i understand before i just runaway with the end result.this is the easiest way to do it?
To prove that they are inverses, you have to demonstrate that f(g(x))=x and that g(f(x))=x. That's the only way to do it. :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!