Okay, so I have the limit as x approaches 0 for the function (x+sinx)/x. I split it into two separate limits, both with x approaching 0, and the functions are x/x and sinx/x. I know if I plug in 0, x/x will give the indeterminate form. But since it says x/x, can I say that that limit will be 1? I know the answer is two, but that part bothers me.
\[\frac{x}{x}=1\] always (unless of course \(x=0\) but since you are taking a limit, you know \(x\neq 0\))
so yes, it is 1 what does \(\frac{x}{x}\) really mean? it means \(1\) except if \(x=0\) it is undefined
OH. Thank you for wording it that way. This whole unit, I never thought of it that way. When I took the limit as x approaches 0, I thought of it as x=0. I didn't really realize that it's just the path to x=0, not actually x=0.
1) Never, EVER "plug in" anything. Sometimes, a substitution is appropriate. It is appropriate with a limit only after you have demonstrated continuity. 2) It does not require any sort of substitution to observe an indeterminate form. "Indeterminate Form" is a concept, not a number or a value. You cannot build one or create one. You can only observe or define such a thing. 0/0 doesn't mean anything in the numerical world. In this world, a limit can by of TYPE 0/0, making it an indeterminate form. 3) Is there some reason to split it up? It already has the 0/0 indeterminate form. My views. I welcome others'.
it is definitely not zero that is the entire reason for all this limit business you want to say "what it gets close to" without actually being that number
historically derivatives came first, limits second people already knew how to take derivatives, but the language was imprecise, because without the notion of a limit, it didn't really make sense to say "it gets smaller and smaller but is never actually that number, but we pretend it is anyways"
i have to disagree somewhat with @tkhunny you do "plug in 0" to see that \[\frac{\sin(x)}{x}\] for example is of the form \(\frac{0}{0}\) without plugging it in, how would you know?
in fact, i would always plug in the number first if you get a number out, that is almost always the limit most any function that you know is continuous on its domain, unless it is defined say as a piecewise function if i wanted \[\lim_{x\to \pi}\frac{\cos(x)}{x}\] i would immediately plug in \(\pi\)
and even if i wanted \[\lim_{x\to \pi}\frac{\cos(x)+1}{x-\pi}\] i would still plug it in once i got \(\frac{0}{0}\) i would know that it was of that form
Well, this is why we leave it open to discussion. :-) 1) "Plug in" doesn't exist. It's called "substitution". 2) We consider the limits of numerator and denominator separately. No substitution required.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!