|5-8x|<=1
What does absolute value mean?
The value inside the notations will always be positive.
Well, kind of... :) I want you to start thinking of absolute value a little bit differently. Absolute value is DISTANCE FROM 0. Got that?
Right
So, |5|=5 since 5 is 5 units from 0. and |-5| = 5 since it is also 5 units from 0, just on the other side.
So if: |something|<=1 then what does that MEAN? what does it tell you about the "something"?
The number will be less than or equal to 1 from zero
It has to be somewhere between 1 and 0 or even be those themselves
OK, the number... or variable... or expression.. whatever the "stuff" inside the abs value sign is, it lives WITHIN 1 unit of 0. So if I have |z|<=1, then that means that z is WITHIN 1 unit of 0, so: -1<=z<=1 If I have |t+3|<=1, then that means that (t+3) is WITHING 1 unit of 0, so: -1<=t+3<=1 So do you see how an understanding of what that abs value expression really MEANS allows me to re-write it as a plain "between inequality" that doesn't involve abs value?
So what does that mean for your problem: |5-8x|<=1 How can you rewrite that, as an equivalent mathematical statement that does not involve the abs value signs?
Oh, that makes it much clearer. -1 <= 5-8x <= 1
Be careful, when you say "It has to be somewhere between 1 and 0 or even be those themselves" I worry that you are forgetting what abs value means. It is DISTANCE FROM 0. So if |z|<=1 then it could be that z=-1, or z=-0.4 or z=1... anything BETWEEN -1 and 1 will satisfy the abs value inequality.
Yes, exactly! Now do you know how to solve that inequality?
Nope
You solve an inequality just like an equation, except that IF you multiply or divide by a negative number, then you have to flip the direction of the ineq. symbol. when you have a "compound inequality" like this one which is called "between notation", you have a couple of options. You can either solve it just like it's a "3 part equation", so anything that you do to one part you do to the other 2. e.g. if I had: -3<1-x<3 I would subtract 1 from all "3 parts" -4<-x<2 and then I would multiply each part by -1 4>x>-2 Notice I had to flip the inequalities! Then I would probably re-write it with the order reversed, just because I think it makes more sense to look at it that way: -2<x<4
So then it would be 1/2 <= x <= 3/4
Option 2 is to break it apart into 2 separate inequalities, with an "and" between them, and solve them separately, following all the same steps: -3<1-x<3 -3<1-x AND 1-x<3 -4<-x AND -x<2 4>x AND x>-2 Notice when I'm finished and I re-combine into between notation, I have: -2<x<4 same as above. So either way works, just kind of depends on preference. Is that example enough for you to try your problem now? Does it make sense?
oh wait, I didn't even see your post there... lol
This makes so much more sense. Thank you so much
Yup, that's what I got - looks right! And you're welcome, happy to help. :)
What do I do when the absolute value is less than the integer on the right?
such as (2x-3)/2 >= 8
Sorry, I mean greater than
So I'm assuming that's an abs value in the ( )? Is it: \[\Large \frac{ \left| 2x-3 \right| }{ 2 }\ge8\] ?? Or is the den'r with the 2 also in the abs value?
The two is also in the abs value
Very good intuition that you need to something a little bit different. :) But again, remember that abs value is the DISTANCE FROM 0. so if |z|>3, then there are TWO ways that can happen.... either z is more than 3 units TO THE LEFT OF 0 or it is more than 3 units TO THE RIGHT of 0. Either way makes it true... so I can rewrite: |z|>3 as ---> z<-3 OR z>3 Notice that it's again a "compound inequality", except this time I have an OR in the middle, not an AND. That's important. And notice that it makes sense, since z certainly can't be BOTH z<-3 and z>3, but it certainly could be one or the other!
So it doesn't matter what the "something" is... if: |something|>a where a is some positive number, then the "something" is AT LEAST a units from 0, so: something<-a OR something>a
So you have:\[\Large \left| \dfrac{2x-3}{2} \right| \ge8\]
So that stuff in the abs values is the "something".... so your compound inequality is?
Oh, I get it now. Thanks!! It would be x>= 19/2 or x<=-13/2?
Yes, that's it! Notice that it's a "2 part" solution set, unlike the first one that is a "one part" set. :) If you are doing interval notation and set unions & intersections, you would write this one as a UNION of 2 sets. But if not, the inequality notation for the solution set should be fine too. :)
Alright I'll be able to finish the rest of this smoothly now. Thanks again!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!