Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

There are several letters e, a and b on a blackboard. We may replace two e's by one e, two a's by one b, two b's by one a, an a and a b by one e, an a and an e by one a,ab, and an e by one b. Prove that the last letter does not depend on the order of erasure.

OpenStudy (blockcolder):

So to summarize: ee becomes e, aa becomes b, bb becomes a. ab becomes e, ae becomes a, be becomes b. Of course, the letters don't have to be adjacent.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thank's for the simplification, but could someone please tell me how I am supposed to prove the last statement?

OpenStudy (blockcolder):

It took me a long time, but here's a solution. Let \(w_i\) be the number of a's, \(x_i\) the number of b's, and \(y_i\) the number of e's at step i. Step 0 is the initial configuration. I assert that if the quantity \(w_0+2x_0\equiv k \pmod{3}\), then \(w_i+2x_i\equiv k \pmod{3}\) for all \(i\leq w_0+x_0+y_0-1\), where k can be 0, 1, or 2. If k=0, then the final letter is e; if k=1, it's a; if k=2, it's b.

OpenStudy (blockcolder):

You can prove this assertion by mathematical induction and considering all the 6 scenarios that can happen.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks a lot!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!