Discrete mathematics (usage of the existential and universal quantifiers and translation into the english language. I'll medal and fan an accurate answerer, whatever wings your ding
Hello, can someone please check my work for the following question? "Let Q(x,y) be the statement "student x has been a contestant on quiz show y." Express each of these sentences in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives, where the universe of discourse for x consists of all students at your school and for y consists of all quiz shows on television.
b. "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show" I got ¬∃x∃yQ(x,y). Is this correct in terms of operator precedence?
@wio welp?
I don't think \( \exists y \) should be used here.
I have to use a binding for y otherwise it remains a predicate though
Hmmm, yeah I suppose it is ok.
the problem is I don't want to say ~(∃x∃y)Q(x,y)
Yeah, that is the problem I originally saw is that ambiguity.
add my own parenthesis?
There is also \( \forall x\neg \exists yQ(x,y) \)
are you sure that's the same thing?
∀x¬∃yQ(x,y)=∀x∀y¬Q(x,y)
It's not as direct because it is saying "All students have not been on any quiz show."
It's logically equivalent. I suppose you could just try doing parenthesis.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!