Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Help !! please !! i'll post the pic up in a bit

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

He's right, and it can be proven with the intermediate value theorem.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

how?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Suppose Shasta's temperature is \(s(t)\) and Dr. James Stewart's temperature is \(j(t)\). Let:\[ f(t) = s(t) - j(t) \]Let \(t_1\) be the time when Shasta is in Alaska and \(t_2\) be the time Stewart is in Alaska. Since Shasta is colder than Stewart at \(t_1\): \[ s(t_1) < j(t_1) \implies f(t_1) < 0 \]And when Stewart is in Alaska: \[ s(t_2) > j(t_1) \implies f(t_2) >0 \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh !!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Can you finish it?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think i'm still going to need more help

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well we know that \(f(t)\) is continuous on the interval \([t_1,t_2]\). We also know that \(f(t_1)<0<f(t_2)\). So the intermediate value theorem claims that there must be some \(t\in [t_1,t_2]\) where \(f(t) = 0\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

When \(f(t)=0\) then we have: \[ f(t) = s(t)-j(t) \implies 0=s(t)-j(t)\implies j(t) = s(t) \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That is pretty much all of it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

let me try to understand this :D but thanks !!!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!