Help !! please !! i'll post the pic up in a bit
He's right, and it can be proven with the intermediate value theorem.
how?
Suppose Shasta's temperature is \(s(t)\) and Dr. James Stewart's temperature is \(j(t)\). Let:\[ f(t) = s(t) - j(t) \]Let \(t_1\) be the time when Shasta is in Alaska and \(t_2\) be the time Stewart is in Alaska. Since Shasta is colder than Stewart at \(t_1\): \[ s(t_1) < j(t_1) \implies f(t_1) < 0 \]And when Stewart is in Alaska: \[ s(t_2) > j(t_1) \implies f(t_2) >0 \]
ohh !!
Can you finish it?
i think i'm still going to need more help
Well we know that \(f(t)\) is continuous on the interval \([t_1,t_2]\). We also know that \(f(t_1)<0<f(t_2)\). So the intermediate value theorem claims that there must be some \(t\in [t_1,t_2]\) where \(f(t) = 0\).
When \(f(t)=0\) then we have: \[ f(t) = s(t)-j(t) \implies 0=s(t)-j(t)\implies j(t) = s(t) \]
That is pretty much all of it.
let me try to understand this :D but thanks !!!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!