Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (user917):

Can someone explain this to me please?

OpenStudy (user917):

Given a real number x, and a natural number N>1. Consider the numbers : 0,x−⌊x⌋,2x−⌊2x⌋,…,Nx−⌊Nx⌋. Show that some pair of these numbers differs by at most 1/N.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Use the pigeon-hole principle

OpenStudy (user917):

But what do they want from me? What should I proof?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Prove that there exists a pair of numbers such that the difference between them is less or equal to than 1/N

OpenStudy (user917):

oh ok thank you :D now I understand.. i'll think about it.. but how can the pigeon-hole principle help me?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I guess it is not exactly the pigeon-hole principle

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The idea is to prove that the total distance between the numbers is greater than 1

OpenStudy (user917):

no, the distance between the 2 numbers can't be greater than 1/N

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sorry, I meant to say that if the distance between all of the numbers is greater than 1/N, then the total distance is greater than 1. This is a contradiction, so there has to exist a pair of numbers with distance less than 1/N.

OpenStudy (user917):

Why it is a contradiction?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[0 \le x-\lfloor x \rfloor < 1\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So all of the numbers are contained in an interval of length 1

OpenStudy (user917):

Sorry but do you believe that I still can't get your point? what do you mean by "total distance" ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah, that is a bit ambiguous

OpenStudy (user917):

why the total difference should be less than 1?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So if we suppose that all of the points are at a distance greater than 1/N from each other, 2 adjacent points on the number line must be separated by at least 1/N

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let's call P_0 the smallest point, P_1 the next largest, P_2 the next largest, et c.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The distance between point P_n and point P_n+x must be greater than x/N

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The total distance is the distance between P_0 and P_N

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This distance is clearly greater than 1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

P_0 is 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Therefore, P_N is greater than 1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This is a contradiction, as: \[x - \lfloor x \rfloor < 1\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Therefore, our initial assumption, that the distance between any adjacent points is greater than 1/N, must be false

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And that is the proof.

OpenStudy (user917):

Thank you very much :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You are welcome

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!