Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 12 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

problem ...need to be solved with real theories

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[-20=20\] \[16-36=25-45\] \[4^{2}-4\times{9 } =5^{2}-5\times{ 9 }\] \[4^{2}-2\times4\times\frac{9 }{ 2 }=5^{2}-2\times5\frac{ 9 }{ 2}\] \[4^{2}-2\times4\times\frac{9 }{ 2 }+\left( \frac{ 9 }{ 2 } \right)^{2}=5^{2}-2\times5\frac{ 9 }{ 2}+\left( \frac{ 9 }{ 2 } \right)^{2}\] \[\left( 4-\frac{ 9 }{ 2 } \right)^{2}=\left( 5-\frac{ 9}{ 2 } \right)^{2}\] \[\sqrt{\left( 4-\frac{ 9 }{ 2 } \right)^{2}}=\sqrt{\left( 5-\frac{ 9}{ 2 } \right)^{2}}\] \[4-\frac{ 9 }{ 2 }=5-\frac{ 9 }{ 2 }\] |dw:1378759825635:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

how can I edit ? −20=-20 m sory it meant like this both negative

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what level math is this?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the high level I mean numbers on R

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmm... what definition of real number you use? Dedekind partitions maybe?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

a made up confusion I am not sure the wrong step . but is 4 double of -2,2 in all condition accept geyometrical calculations when we take off the root square with absolute value ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

square root taking is like finding side of square who's diagonal is equal to the number under root sign

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but still the result is not equal even if both are negative

OpenStudy (anonymous):

length can never be negative

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think that's what is ment by geometrical calculations

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it appears that: \[\pm (4 - \frac{ 9 }{ 2 }) = ∓(5-\frac{ 9 }{ 2 })\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes exactelly but why ? mean wich step is wrong and how ..

hartnn (hartnn):

\(\sqrt{x^2}= |x|\) actually

hartnn (hartnn):

so, if x is negative, as is the case for 4-9/2 |x| will be -x = - (4-9/2) = 1/2 for 5-9/2, x is positive so |x| =x so, 5-9/2 = 1/2

hartnn (hartnn):

got this ?

hartnn (hartnn):

because answer of square root can never be negative while dealing with real numbers

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it's been a long time for me since i studied those. one more thing i there like a theorical proof ? texts ... and thanks seems obviously right

hartnn (hartnn):

theoritical proof...if i find one i will attach...

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!