For the limit lim x → 2 (x3 − 4x + 9) = 9 illustrate the definition by finding the largest possible values of δ that correspond to ε = 0.2 and ε = 0.1
We can confirm the limit:\[ \lim_{x\to a} f(x) = L \]If we can show that for any \(\epsilon\) there exists a \(\delta\) such that:\[ \forall x:\quad|x-a| < \delta \implies |f(x) - L| < \epsilon \]
after i take the 9 to right side and subtract it i get 0 i take x common then what ?
Let's start with \(\epsilon =0.2\)
alright then ?
\[ |(x^2-4x+9)-9|<0.2 \]
You need to solve for \(x\) here.
alrights lets see
\[ |x^2-4x|<0.2 \]
\[ |a\cdot b|=|a||b| \]
\[ |x||x-4|<0.2 \]
i make it \[x ^{3}-4x\]
Oh right... sorry.
\[ |x^3-4|<0.2\implies -0.2<x^3-4x<0.2 \]
hmm that seems rigth
For the \(\delta\) we find:\[ -\delta <x-2<\delta \]
By the way \(x^3-4x=x(x^2-4)=x(x-2)(x+2)\)
yes i was thinkiong of that . but couldnt solve after it
What we basically have is: \[ \delta = \frac {0.2}{x(x+2)} \]
If we let \(x=2\) at this point, then: \[ \delta = \frac{0.2}{2(2+2)}=\frac{0.2}{8} \]
so now to slove for delta
y we taking x as 2?
Its \[ \lim_{x\to 2} \]
my bad !
Though we should definitely double check our answer now.
i have lost all hopes with this question
alright let me ask someone
Okay sorry, we did something wrong.
no one to confirm bro . but if we solving for 0.1 we subsitute 0.2 right?
did we?
Yeah, I shouldn't have done \(x=2\).
but its tending toward 2 right?
Yeah, but at \(x=2\) we underestimate the epsilon.
Okay, I got another idea!
hmmm . my friend got the first one as 0.01
That is not the largest possible \(\delta\) though.
hmmm shes gonna tell the method then maybe it could help us
My next solution is to try letting \(x=2+\delta\)
\[ (2+\delta)^3-4(2+\delta)-9=9+0.2 \]
\[6\delta ^{2} + 8\delta+\delta ^{3} - 9\]
= 9+0.2
that is correct if we solve it
now lets see what my friend says
\[ \delta<1.13219\\ \delta<1.11637 \]
so its 1.1
They both must be true, so that means \(1.11637\) is the largest.
hmmm i see and for 0.1 we just add that pellet?
to the right side*
Oh no, I typed it in wrong before!
damn :P
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%282%2B%CE%B4%29%5E3%E2%88%924%282%2B%CE%B4%29%2B9%3D9%2B0.2
now we got 3 solutions
Yeah, you always take the smallest one.
I mean the one that is closes to 0.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%282%2B0.024%29%5E3%E2%88%924%282%2B0.024%29%2B9%3D9%2Bepsilon Look at how close \(|\delta| =0.024\) is!
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%282%2B%CE%B4%29%5E3%E2%88%924%282%2B%CE%B4%29%2B9%3D9%2B0.2
Yeah, I'd go with \[ \delta \approx \pm 0.025485 \]
sweet
It's the lowest of all 6 deltas.
hmm true
u helped a lottt broo
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%282%2B%CE%B4%29%5E3%E2%88%924%282%2B%CE%B4%29%2B9%3D9-0.1 http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%282%2B%CE%B4%29%5E3%E2%88%924%282%2B%CE%B4%29%2B9%3D9%2B0.1
When epsilon is 0.1 the lowest delta we have is: 0.0123847
yep saw that
Those are pretty accurate.
I feel bad using wolfram for this, but cubic roots is NOT a trivial thing.
The cubic formula looks like a monster that ate ten quadratic formulas.
hahhaha thats one way to put it:P
See for yourself.
its not hard bt this question is the first one i encountered trouble with
"Welcome to OpenStudy. I can guide regarding this useful site; ask your doubts from me, for it you can message me. Please use the chat for off topic questions. And remember to give the helper a medal, by clicking on "Best Answer". We follow a code of conduct, ( http://openstudy.com/code-of-conduct ). Please take a moment to read it."
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!