State the value of this quantity, if it exists. If it does not exist, explain why: h(-3)
it doesn't exist unless we know what \(h(x)\) is
I'll upload the accompanying graph
Does that change anything?
By "know what h(x) is" do you mean knowing the limit?
There is a hole at x = -3 on the graph, so it looks like h(-3) doesn't exist and it's not defined.
That makes sense! What would the case be with h(0)?
you tell me
Well I don't know... if we're coming from both sides, one has a hole and one doesn't
but do you see how there's a closed circle at (0,1) that means that h(0) is defined
the limit is NOT defined at x = 0 because the left and right hand limits are different as x--> 0 but the limit is defined at x = -3
Ok thank you
yw
Wait... you reasoned that h(-3) cannot exist due to the presence of a hole, bu then by that logic, how would \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^+} h(x)\] exist, since it too encounters a hole
h(-3) itself doesn't exist, but the limiting value as x ---> -3 does exist
h(0) exists because h(0) = 1
but as x ---> 0, the limit is NOT defined (the two sides need to meet up at the same y value for the limit to exist)
limits can exist if you approach a hole...you're not actually arriving at the hole, just getting closer and closer
Oh, that makes sense! So h(-3) doesn't exist do to the fact that it reaches (-3) and encounters a hole, while limx→0+h(x) can exist because it's only approaching (that it, never reaching) the 0
Thank you again!!
h(-3) also doesn't exist because plugging in x = -3 doesn't produce any y value or output, so that's why that hole exists and there are no other points above or below that hole (that we can see at least), so this adds more evidence that h(-3) doesn't exist at all
and yes the right hand limit exists because you can get closer and closer to 0 from the right (this works because the function is continuous to the right of x = 0, but not actually continuous at x = 0)
Superb!! So just one more question... you said above that h(0)= 1, but how is that so if there's two dots... do we just assume the one that is a hole to not exist, so we go with the positive one (1)?
the function exists at the closed circle the open circle denotes that something should exist there, but it's like the point has be ripped out and moved elsewhere
for instance, say we had this continuous graph |dw:1379474777276:dw|
the point (5,2) exists and it is defined, so if this graph is of f(x), then f(5) exists and it is defined |dw:1379474818952:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!