Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

State the value of this quantity, if it exists. If it does not exist, explain why: h(-3)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it doesn't exist unless we know what \(h(x)\) is

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'll upload the accompanying graph

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Does that change anything?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

By "know what h(x) is" do you mean knowing the limit?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

There is a hole at x = -3 on the graph, so it looks like h(-3) doesn't exist and it's not defined.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That makes sense! What would the case be with h(0)?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

you tell me

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well I don't know... if we're coming from both sides, one has a hole and one doesn't

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

but do you see how there's a closed circle at (0,1) that means that h(0) is defined

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

the limit is NOT defined at x = 0 because the left and right hand limits are different as x--> 0 but the limit is defined at x = -3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok thank you

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

yw

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Wait... you reasoned that h(-3) cannot exist due to the presence of a hole, bu then by that logic, how would \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^+} h(x)\] exist, since it too encounters a hole

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

h(-3) itself doesn't exist, but the limiting value as x ---> -3 does exist

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

h(0) exists because h(0) = 1

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

but as x ---> 0, the limit is NOT defined (the two sides need to meet up at the same y value for the limit to exist)

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

limits can exist if you approach a hole...you're not actually arriving at the hole, just getting closer and closer

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh, that makes sense! So h(-3) doesn't exist do to the fact that it reaches (-3) and encounters a hole, while limx→0+h(x) can exist because it's only approaching (that it, never reaching) the 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thank you again!!

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

h(-3) also doesn't exist because plugging in x = -3 doesn't produce any y value or output, so that's why that hole exists and there are no other points above or below that hole (that we can see at least), so this adds more evidence that h(-3) doesn't exist at all

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

and yes the right hand limit exists because you can get closer and closer to 0 from the right (this works because the function is continuous to the right of x = 0, but not actually continuous at x = 0)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Superb!! So just one more question... you said above that h(0)= 1, but how is that so if there's two dots... do we just assume the one that is a hole to not exist, so we go with the positive one (1)?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

the function exists at the closed circle the open circle denotes that something should exist there, but it's like the point has be ripped out and moved elsewhere

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

for instance, say we had this continuous graph |dw:1379474777276:dw|

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

the point (5,2) exists and it is defined, so if this graph is of f(x), then f(5) exists and it is defined |dw:1379474818952:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!