Solve the differential equation by using substitution for homogeneous equations. see attachment...
It's like everything goes great until i have to integrate the left side...always crashing at that
What was the original problem?
This? \[\Large y' = \frac{y}{x+y}\]
yeah
\[\Large y\color{red}{dx}-(x+y)\color{blue}{dy}=0\]
divide by 1/x to get y/x and then subsitute it with the u, but I've learned a shortcut that cuts steps off...ummmm I have to use subsitution....
Letting \[\Large x = vy\]
like.... du/F(1,u)-u = dx/x that formula
\[\Large \color{red}{dx}=v\color{blue}{dy}+y\color{green}{dv}\]
\[\Large y(v\color{blue}{dy}+ y\color{green}{dv})- (vy + y)\color{blue}{dy}=0\]
Look good so far?
what the heck???!?!?!?!?!?!!?!? the methods I learned from my class seemed less letterish than this.
Want me to run them by you? :)
and I'm more concerned about the ending part like when you turn it into separate variables and antiderivative... the attachment has the answer but the crazy book has it at x=ylny+C which I don't get it because it involves some manipulation
\[\Large y(v\color{blue}{dy}+ y\color{green}{dv})- (vy + y)\color{blue}{dy}=0\]
Let's see if we can get that from here :D Simplifying, we get \[\Large y^2\color{green}{dv}- y\color{blue}{dy}=0\]
\[\Large y^2\color{green}{dv} = y \color{blue}{dy}\]
\[\Large \color{green}{dv} = \frac{\color{blue}{dy}}{y}\]
\[\Large \int\color{green}{dv} =\int \frac{\color{blue}{dy}}{y}\]
yeah which leaves a v = lny and subsitute v back... heyhow did you get it so fast?
Because... I used that 'letterish' method? :D
So, everything cleared up @UsukiDoll ?
that was...fast.....the du/F(1,u)-u = 1/x dx had some additional stuff.. what the heckkkkkkk
eating at the moment...sorry I feel peckish
math makes me hungry :S
mhmm well, if you're not fast, you're not doing it right XD LOL jk
alright I need the run down on the letterish method. seems like you got it fast like a boss
oh I see it now... x=vy and then product rule it...put it back in simplify if possible and then use separate variables. I should do that on number 5 and see if I could get it lightning fast like a boss.
ok nevermind....too many letters going on...just what the heck???????
@UsukiDoll sorry was preoccupied... still up for it?
nuh uh...what is the first step ? did you rearranged the problem?
\[\Large y' = \frac{y}{x+y}\]
\[\Large \frac{\color{blue}{dy}}{\color{red}{dx}}= \frac{y }{x+y}\] Got it up to here?
yeah....
Okay, so that rearranges into \[\Large (x+y)\color{blue}{dy}= y\color{red}{dx}\]
A little algebraic manipulation gives us \[\Large y\color{red}{dx}-(x+y)\color{blue}{dy}=0\]
So far so good?
ya
So... now we have it of the form \[\Large M(x,y) \color{red}{dx} +N(x,y) \color{blue}{dy}=0\]
Ever heard of homogenous functions?
just leaarned about it the other day...that's how I got the formula du/F(1,u)-u = 1/x dx
Well, that's just missing the essence of it :3 In our case, a function f of two variables f(x,y) is homogeneous with degree k if for any number \(\lambda\), \[\Large f(\lambda x,\lambda y) = \lambda^kf(x,y)\] understood?
oh yeah to test out if the equation is homogeneous you replace the x and y's with the landa x landa y and then the landas cancell
more like it can be factored out. Now, when written in this form \[\Large M(x,y) \color{red}{dx} +N(x,y) \color{blue}{dy}=0\] and M and N are both homogeneous *of the same degree* then you can work a little magic to turn it into a separable equation :)
So... in our particular case \[\Large y\color{red}{dx}-(x+y)\color{blue}{dy}=0\] y and (x+y) are both homogeneous of degree 1, aren't they? :)
why ia there a negative at -(x+y) dy?
Do I really have to answer that? -.-
no it was moved over...
or switch places
Okay, back to reality... since we know both terms here are homogeneous with degree 1, \[\Large y\color{red}{dx}-(x+y)\color{blue}{dy}=0\] We can either let x = vy or y = vx
I pick x, well, because the dx terms is simpler, being just a monomial and all.
So we let x = vy. Note that this is the same as letting \[\Large v = \frac{x}y\]
You copy? :)
yup... the v variable is by itself also. x = yv x' yv'+v
\[\Large x = vy\]\[\Large \frac{\color{red}{dx}}{\color{blue}{dy}}=v + y\frac{\color{green}{dv}}{\color{blue}{dy}}\]Yup ^_^
Multiplying both sides by \(\color{blue}{dy}\) gives \[\Large \color{red}{dx}= v\color{blue}{dy} + y\color{green}{dv}\]
and then subsitute that back into the equation
Just do the necessary substitutions here: \[\Large y\color{red}{dx}-(x+y)\color{blue}{dy}=0\] Replacing dx with that new differential expression and x with vy
And everything follows ^_^
what about for y' = x divided by x+y ?
this is what I got so far. dy/dx = x/x+y (x+y)dy = xdx xdy+ydy-xdx=0 xdx-(xdy+ydy)=0 x(v+ydv)-xdy-ydy=0 xv+xydv-xdy-ydy=0 v^2y+y^2vdv-vydy-ydy = o I don't see any cancellations whatsoever..
Sorry again... let me see...
We start with this one... \[\Large x\color{red}{dx}-(x+y)\color{blue}{dy}=0\]
And this still holds: \[\Large \color{red}{dx}= v\color{blue}{dy} + y\color{green}{dv}\]
Ready?
@UsukiDoll talk to me ^_^
k k hang on ... let me write this down...
k got it
Okay, we let x = vy and dx = vdy + ydv \[\Large vy(v\color{blue}{dy}+y\color{green}{dv})-(vy+y)\color{blue}{dy}=0\]
Actually, the whole point of this substitution wasn't really to make things cancel out, it's just to make the entire differential equation separable! Okay? :) We were just lucky the first time around, when things cancelled out.
yeah but this time it's what the heckk....
So, don't be afraid and let's just simplify :3 \[\Large v^2y\color{blue}{dy}+vy^2\color{green}{dv}-y(v+1)\color{blue}{dy }=0\]
Got that?
for the -y(v+1)dy can you distribute the dy?
Yes, but that only serves to complicate things. In fact, as much as possible, we'd only like one dy and one dv. So instead of distributing the dy, we should just factor it out... but later. First, let's bring all the dy's to the right-side.
\[\Large vy^2\color{green}{dv}=y(v+1)\color{blue}{dy }-v^2y\color{blue}{dy}\] Catch me so far?
ya
And THEN factor out the dy. \[\Large vy^2\color{green}{dv}=[y(v+1)-v^2y]\color{blue}{dy}\]
got it
Actually, we can factor out the y on the right-hand side. \[\Large vy^2\color{green}{dv}=y[v+1-v^2]\color{blue}{dy}\]
And the entire thing is now separable... \[\Large \frac{v}{v+1-v^2}\color{green}{dv}= \frac{\color{blue}{dy}}{y}\]
ok then multiply the dsafsdfsdadfafsd more like divide the v's to the left and the y^2 goes to the right
Eventually you end up with that ^ Good luck integrating that, though :/ Looks terrible
b^2-4ac will tell me whether it's factorable.
It kind of is, it's just not pretty D:
and it's not..... gotta use quadratics... I know what it is it's 1/2+ - sqrt 5
You do that dirty bit... :3
but how to put it in place
partial fractions?
ha ha tried to fdo that yesterday
I'm not the best guy to help out with that... I get dizzy with equations :/
how is that going to work when it's not factorable to begin with unless you mean Ax+ nB all over that v^2-v-1
It is factorable... it's just that its roots aren't pretty... what ARE its roots anyway?
been there it's -1/2-sqroot5/2
and -1/2 +sqroot(5)/2
I believe it's 1/2 and not -1/2
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!