Yaloswagomatics
@Shikanu
Theorem: there exists two irrational numbers n and m such that \(\large n^m\) is rational
let us use the number \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\)
if \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) is irrational, then \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}}\)=\(\Huge \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}*\sqrt{2}}=\Huge \sqrt{2}^2=2\)
\Huge \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}} Where did this come from
well take n=\(\sqrt 2\) and take m=\(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\)
Okay
if \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) is rational, then take n=\(\sqrt{2}\) and m=\(\sqrt 2\) and you are finished.
QED
This is harder to wrap my head around than the other thereom.
so whether or not \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) is rational or irrational we just proved the theorem.
? NO luck here
OK. Let's start over. Theorem: there exists two irrational numbers n and m such that \(n^m\) is rational
Let us look at the number \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) It is either rational or irrational, correct?
I thought it was just rational I do not see how it is both
the number \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) is either rational or irrational (but not both) correct?
Oh Ok
let us first assume that the number \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) is rational. Then, for the theorem we attempt to prove, take n=\(\sqrt 2\) and m=\(\sqrt 2\) and the theorem is true.
Correct?
Okay, so in the above example you said it was rational. What happens if you assume it is irrational. What changes?
@Gin_Ichimaru
Let us now assume that \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) is irrational. Then, \(\large (\sqrt{2})^{\sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}}=(\sqrt{2})^{\sqrt2*\sqrt2}\)
=\(\sqrt2^2=2\)
take n=\(\sqrt{2}\) and m=\(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) and the theorem is true.
therefore the theorem is true. QED
So since it is neither rational or irrational, The answer will always be 2
?
No.
If \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) is rational then the theorem is true. If \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) is irrational then the theorem is still true. Therefore the theorem must be true.
I broke it down into two cases, and showed that for either case that the theorem was true.
this is called a non-constructive proof because I never established whether or not \(\Huge \sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}\) is rational or irrational. I merely used it as an example, and showed that in any case the theorem would be true, if only I took different values for n and m.
Oh okay
Yoloswagomatics is a good name for this, no doubt
yup.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!