HELP ME!!!!!!!!! Calculus! Do a delta-epsilon proof for:
\[\lim_{x \rightarrow 4}\frac{ x^2-16 }{ x-4} =8\]
Do you even need to do a delta epsilon proof? The top is (x-4)(x+4), so you're simply asked for the lim x->4 of x+4. That's pretty clearly 8...
@elementalmagicks Wow you're confused, lol.
i know but my teacher wants us to do it using a delta-epsilon proof :/
\[ |x-4|<\delta\implies \left|\frac{x^2-16}{x-4}-8\right| <\epsilon \]
I'm confused apparently. wio hath spoken.
@voltron21 What is stopping you from finishing the proof?
@wio im as confused with this whole concept as @elementalmagicks
@elementalmagicks Yeah you are. There is a difference between a "proof" and just "evaluating"
\[ |x-4|<\delta\implies \left|\frac{x^2-16}{x-4}-8\right| <\epsilon \]Becomes: \[ |x-4|<\delta\implies \left|\frac{(x-4)(x+4)}{x-4}-8\right| <\epsilon \]Since it is a limit, we assume \(x\neq 4\) so we have:\[ |x-4|<\delta\implies \left|(x+4)-8\right| <\epsilon \]
@voltron21 Is it making sense yet?
@wio kind of, so u set the restrictions and now you're simplifying
I suppose I feel silly giving an "epsilon delta" proof when delta can just be chosen to be epsilon.
Typically you have to choose more creatively, but this apparently was just asking you for the basic mechanics.
The idea of epsilon delta proofs is that epsilon is fixed and then you pick a delta such that the implications that wio was been writing as satisfied.
are*
@voltron21 Yes, and with these sorts of proofs you generally want to get to something of the form: \[ |x-a| <\delta \implies g(x)|x-a|<\epsilon \] In this case \(g(x)=1\) so it is relatively easy \(\delta \sim \epsilon\). If \(g(x)=c\) (a constant) we'd pick \(\delta \sim \epsilon/ c\)
@wio so is that it? is that the proof?
I'm sort of explaining the methodology for the proof.
@wio so ur not done?lol
The proof was done a while ago.
Once you get to:\[ |x-4|<\delta \implies |x-4|<\epsilon \]You just say \(\delta \sim \epsilon\) and you're done.
@wio i thought i was supposed to get to the whole thing =epsilon
You have to basically let \(\delta\) be a function of \(\epsilon\), which we did.
@wio what does that little squiggle mean... sorry i dont understand math talk
@wio and where did the 8 go?
Don't worry about it, it doesn't have any special meaning.
\(=\) here is fine as well
@wio oh so it just means =
\(\sim\) means in the ballpark of, technically delta doesn't have to equal epsilon since it can be less.
@wio so it means about ok that makes sense but i still don't understand what happened to the 8
\[ x+4-8=x-4 \]
@wio oh lol got ya i just didnt see that...thanks!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!