Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 10 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

A classmate says that line AB is parallel to line DC based on the diagram belowe. Explain the error.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

attachment of diagram

OpenStudy (anonymous):

tha diagram is wrong

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh thanks i didnt realize.... :P *sarcasm*

OpenStudy (anonymous):

could you elaborate ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol well there's no ducks in it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohhhhh yesssss, very wise.. im sure my teacher will approve

OpenStudy (anonymous):

make a drawing of a duck it should help allot better with your math problem :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i cant draw duckies :P I can draw a house tho ! CAD 2 like waddup

OpenStudy (anonymous):

XD

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol ughhhh somebody who is qualified plz explain what is wrong with this diagrammmmmm

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

wat do you think, they're parallel ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@greenlegodude57 @mathessentials @ϟƘƦƖןןΣ✘@chels1226 @elohelowlet @Jamierox4ev3r @uri @Aiko @StateFarm @AndyCool @Asuna_Yuuki @dumbcow @Trillography

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im supposed to explain that they arent parallel

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

yup, before u explain, you need to convince urself that they're not parallel right ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

to be exact - you need to convince urself that, we cannot say they're parallel

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it looks pretty durn parallel to me. i dont know how to say it isnt

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Meniether...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Is this a multiple choice question? If so, what are the answers?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

its an essay :P

HanAkoSolo (jamierox4ev3r):

even if it looks parallel, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is indeed parallel. Now you just need to prove it with the given information

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you dont know how Z, X hit they can be anything and the opposite 90° have no real relation to each other

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

The actual error was in applying the \(\large \text{alternate interior angles theorem} \) incorrectly. The student arrived at the conclusion that AB || CD because, he thought WZ adn XY are parallel, but they're not given as parallel. He **assumed** them to be parallel, which is a serious offense in geometry proofs.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How does the relation between WZ and XY determine the relation between AB and DC ??

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Once he made that error, \(\angle WZY \cong \angle XYC\) by corresponding angles postulate. then by applying \(\large \text{alternate interior angles theorem }\) , he concluded that AB || CD

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohhhhhhhhhhh I can seeeee ! :O

OpenStudy (anonymous):

grazie grazie grazie !

OpenStudy (anonymous):

basically the angles are only the same when the line it goes through is parallel |dw:1380110132549:dw|

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

also observe that, we're given \(\angle AWZ \cong \angle XYC \). so its very easy to get fooled !

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and if WZ , XY are parallel they are 2 lines with exact same angles there

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so if WZ ,XY are parallel you can basically put one onto the other and treat them added like one line with two angle information and two angle information is enough to determine parallelity

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you can "overlay" WZ, XY if they're really parallel and get one piece of info from each one ;)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!