g(x)=-log(x)+2
What do you want to do here?
I get a little irritated when people just write an expression without saying what they want to be done to that expression and leave.
Description of transformation: Equation(s) for the Vertical Asymptote(s): x-intercept in (x, y) form Im sorry please help me this is what i need
So you want to find the x intercept??
this is what my teacher gave me and then she gave me another problem but this what she wrote on the top to do the problems Describe the transformations on the following graph of f (x) log( x). State the placement of the vertical asymptote and x-intercept after the transformation. For example, vertical shift up 2 or reflected about the x-axis are descriptions
since you cannot take the log of 0 or any negative number, this means that the vertical asymptote is x = 0 this is the vertical boundary that the graph approaches, but never gets to it
to find the x-intercept of y = -log(x) + 2 plug in y = 0 to get 0 = -log(x) + 2 now solve for x
this was the question g(x)=-log(x)+2 Description of transformation: Equation(s) for the Vertical Asymptote(s): x-intercept in (x, y) form:
if you start with y = log(x) and change it to y = -log(x), then you have reflected the original over the x axis to get the new graph if you add 9 to the end, you are shifting the second graph up 9 units so that explains how the graphs are related
im still lost sorry
where are you lost
|dw:1380236774129:dw| To illustrate what jim thomspon is saying.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!