Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 10 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

why set of irrational nos are not dense??? while we consider this def of dense set a set A is said to be dense in R if there is a point of A between any two real nos....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Does the definition specify that the two real numbers are distinct? After all, there is no irrational number "between" two indistinct rational numbers...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

e.g???

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well, between 1 and 1 for example.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes rel nos must be distinct

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but these r not distinct

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmm. Between any two real distinct numbers there is indeed always an irrational number (and a rational one for that matter). So that definition is not very good...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but i want the ans of my que according to this def???

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If you insist on using this definition (and specifying that the real numbers you choose must be distinct), then the irrationals are "dense". Where does this question/definition com from? Is this the exact wording?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@rosy :May I join ? @Erin001001

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@E.ali Of course :-) You don't need to ask, just join in!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

K ! Thank you ! So whats the problem ???

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes this is exact def....alternatively we can say every open interval of R contains a pt of A

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes why not E.ali

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you can easily see what is the problem E.ali:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

K ! But whats your problem in @Erin001001 ' s answer ???:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

set of irrational nos can never be dense in R

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this is the problem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Is it your mean ?: I cant be in R you say ... OK ?!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@rosy By both definitions, the set of irrationals is dense, so they're probably not very good definitions. Regarding the second definition, the empty set is strictly speaking an open interval, so according to that definition alone (and no other assumptions), no sets would be dense...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Bad definitions aside, I don't really see a problem here. Why do you insist on the set of irrational not being dense?!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

bcz it is a fact that set of rational nos is dense but irrationals are not...:(

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Actually, the set of irrationals is dense ;-)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no it is wrong

OpenStudy (anonymous):

!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I know this question is closed, but perhaps this can convince you: http://www.proofwiki.org/wiki/Irrationals_Dense_in_Reals You can find various other proofs if you google "irrationals dense". The Wikipedia article on "Dense set" also lists the set of rationals, as well as the set of irrationals, as dense sets.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!