Limits, http://screencast.com/t/xA9Gd3HUR6
we can interchange y and e and ln e=1 so its same as y^1
they are saying if ln(y)-> -3 as x-> inf (the natural log of y approaches -3 when x goes to infinity) then you can make each side the exponent of e e^ln(y) --> e^-3 and say that the left side e^ln(y) approaches e^-3 as x goes to infinity the left side is the same as y, or y --> e^-3 as x--> infinity
in other words, if you know , for example, y--> -3 then you can assume that f(y) --> f(-3) where f() is a function.... as long as the function is "nice" (meaning continuous )
I can understand why this would be correct e^ln(y) --> e^-3 But why this ? ln(y) --> e^-3
We took out e from the left side and they are still equal to each other ?
*** But why this ? ln(y) --> e^-3 *** It does not say that. It says ln(y) --> -3
u see what I mean
Here is what they did: the problem is find the limit \[\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \left( 1-\frac{ 3 }{ x } \right)^x\] that looks tricky. So they said... let's take the natural log of that expression and find the limit of this new expression. \[ \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \ln\left( 1-\frac{ 3 }{ x } \right)^x \\ \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x\ln\left( 1-\frac{ 3 }{ x } \right) \\ \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\ln\left( 1-\frac{ 3 }{ x } \right)}{\frac{1}{x}} \]
its a form of limits of 1^infinity which is solved by e^{(f(x)-1)*g(x)} where f(x) tends to 1 and g(x) tends to infinity
they eventually show that the limit is \[ \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\ln\left( 1-\frac{ 3 }{ x } \right)}{\frac{1}{x}} = -3\] or \[ \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \ln\left( 1-\frac{ 3 }{ x } \right)^x = -3 \] next, they undo the natural log by making each side the exponent of e you get \[ \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \left( 1-\frac{ 3 }{ x } \right)^x= e^{-3} \]
where did "y" go ?
y is \[ \left( 1-\frac{ 3 }{ x } \right)^x \]
so lny = ln(1 - 3/x) ------> (1 - 3/x)^x = (1 - 3/x)^x ?
lny = xln(1 - 3/x) * * * ** * * * correction
I think they are using y just to simplify the write-up. It is shorter than typing out the original messy expression. You do not need to use y. You can do it the way I did up above.
thanks for the help
clear as mud ?
Yea ! =)
if you can ask your question a different way maybe there is a way to answer it so it makes sense?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!