does this sentence have any errors in it?
which sentence?
if they were too descriptive, some reporter's stories never were published at all.
it to not too
No, the "too" is correct
no its not
I think the error is in "reporter's"
so i should put punctuation error?
yeah
the focus of the sentence is the descriptive, some reporter's stories
Ok here is the definition: The trick to remember when to use "too" is the extra "o" in the word. Why? Because the word "too" (as you seen in the definition before) is used when you're referring to an extra or excessive amount of something. You must get into the habit of making a conscious decision every time you write the word "to" in a composition. Ask yourself if you are dealing with an amount or an excess of something. Soon you'll get it right every time!
too is used when referring to excessive.. like in your sentence :)
the too isnt in the focus of what we are seeing is correct so i would assume it is correct
yes that is right
I was just replying to Mr I like to read :)
so there is no error? or is the place of the contraction on reporter wrong?
reporter's is supposed to be repoters'
reporters'
okay so punctuation error got it
To show plural possession, make the noun plural first. Then immediately use the apostrophe. Examples: two boys' hats two women's hats two actresses' hats two children's hats the Changs' house the Joneses' golf clubs the Strauses' daughter the Sanchezes' artwork the Hastingses' appointment the Leeses' books
yep :)
I think the sentence should read: Since they were too descriptive, some reporter's stories were never published. I would substitute the word 'since' for 'if' in the beginning, and rearrange the ending because you can't put 'never' and 'at all' together like that. :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!