Find the general solution of:\[\Large \vec x\;'\quad=\quad A\;\vec x\]Where,\[\Large A\quad=\quad \left[\begin{matrix}-3 & 4 \\ -2 & 1\end{matrix}\right]\] So looking for eigenvalues:\[\Large \det(A-\lambda I)\quad=\quad \det \left[\begin{matrix}-3-\lambda & 4 \\ -2 & 1-\lambda\end{matrix}\right]\quad=\quad0\] Giving us ummmm,\[\Large (-3-\lambda)(1-\lambda)+8\quad=\quad 0\]Simplifies to (maybe someone can check my work here, this seems to be the spot I make the most mistakes in):\[\Large \lambda^2+2\lambda+5\quad=\quad 0\]
Which gives us complex e-values:\[\Large \lambda\quad=\quad -1\pm2i\]
Whichhhh doesn't seem to be working out very nicely when I try to find the e-vectors :b So maybe I made a mistake earlier somewhere... For \(\Large \lambda\quad=\quad-1-2i\), \[\Large \left[\begin{matrix}-2+2i & 4 \\ -2 & 2i\end{matrix}\right]\vec v\quad=\quad \vec 0\]
This is for ODE's, yes?
yes ODE2 :o
Hmm....I don't remember eigenvectors, but it's supposed to mean something.
lol dat abs :3 i think it's time you updated to an even prettier picture, like Ron Jeremy or something
Or Steve Buscemi!
I think we should focus our attention on the problem rather than my aesthetics :)
Anyblaze it 420, according to definition: \(\sf \color{red}{Ax=cx,~x}\) is nonzero vector,then you have \(\sf \color{}{Ax=0}\) which means it has nonzero solutions, and also means A is singlear. and that the eigenvector is not uniquely determined.
you have formula to find it out, right? just apply as if it is real eigenvalue,
complex number ? so what? no different
Oh I did my matrix incorrectly -_- grr So it should be this... which is... maybe solvable now :p hmm \[\Large \left[\begin{matrix}-2+2i & 4 \\ -2 & \color{teal}{2+2i}\end{matrix}\right]\vec v\quad=\quad \vec 0\]
hihihi.... I am dizzy in switching between your 2 posts. I am not back there again
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!