Limits again.
Thank You again, I preciate your help and contribution to my learning!!!
Alright. Let's talk about some properties of limits. It's going to be similar to properties of exponents or properties of multiplication.
Suppose we have a constant function. For example \(f(x)=5\). No matter what \(x\) is, then \(f(x)\) always is equal to \(5\).
It shouldn't be shocking to realize that \[ \lim_{x\to a}f(x)=5 \]This is regardless of \(a\). Even if \(a=2\) or \(a=99\) it will always happen.
So it would not matter what x is equal to at all, and whether it is equal to a 100 or 3 the graph will be the same?
Yes. \(f(x)\) will always approach \(5\).
And the difference b/w x=4 and x=100 when f(x)=5, is just going to be "how close is it to 5", right?
So we write this property as: \[ \lim_{x\to a}c=c \]And we say \(c\) is a constant with respect to \(x\).
Well, in all cases it will be equal to \(5\). It's never going to be not equal to 5 or a little bit under 5, for example.
I see!
The graph is:|dw:1381724037682:dw| In these cases if you let \(a=-10\) or \(a=10\) then you see it is still \(5\).
10 and -10, where are they from?
Okay, the next property of limits: Suppose we know the limit \(f(x)\to L\) and \(g(x)\to K\) when \(x\to a\). Then we know that \([f(x)+g(x)]\to [L+K]\) when \(x\to a\).
\(10\) and \(-10\) were randomly selected.
Does that make sense? Do you understand what I mean about the adding thing?
Your comment when you say "Okay, the next property of limits...." I got lost there!
I don't get the formulas f(x) arrow L g(x) arrow K what is the difference b/w those two?
Okay, so remember \[ g(x) = \frac{(x-2)(x+1)}{x-2} \]We said\[ \lim_{x\to 2}\frac{(x-2)(x+1)}{x-2}=3 \]
So g(x) is a regular function and with L it is limited to a certain value, correct?
And for \[ f(x) =5 \]We said \[ \lim_{x\to a}5=5 \]This even works when \(a=2\) \[ \lim_{x\to 2}5=5 \]
What the addition property says is: \[ \lim_{x\to 2}5+\frac{(x-2)(x+1)}{x-2} =5+3 = 8 \]
and the last formula works and is about/approximately the same for any value of a?
Yeah, that formula for constants works for any value of \(a\).
However, this addition property only works if \(a\) is the same value in both cases.
So \(a\) had to be \(2\) in both cases for it to work.
Now, I confused you with the arrows, right? Let me explain it a bit.
When I write the \(f(x)\to L\) I'm almost saying something like \(f(x)\approx L\). The point is that \(f(x)\) gets closer and closer to \(0\).
get it! Thank A lot man!!!!!
I get the arrow!
I mean \(L\) not \(0\). That was a typo. \(f(x)\) gets closer to \(L\).
Yep! In fact you could use arrows to show a limit, but the \(\lim\) notation is more popular and familiar.
Yeah, I didn't see the zero, when i saw a symbol for approximately equals I already got it...
Okay, do you understand the addition property of limits?
Yes! I think I do! @wio, can we go to a different question soon inkyvoyd constantly distracts me by typing and not posting, b/c it keeps saying that he is typing.
(and you will get more medals)
message me!
Okay one moment.
Thank You!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!