How did the Eastern Woodland Indiands differ from Indians in Mexico and Central America? A. Their social structure was rigidly hierarchical. B. They did not divide labor according to gender. C. They did not engage in warfare. D. Their outlook was more communal than individualistic.
Can you mention me when you get the answer to this question? I really want to know!
I think it's A.
@Alexis.Sage, are you sure, why do you think that?
I though of some common sense thinking to exclude all other chices besides A, and I would put A on the test as well, but I am not sure to promote and guarantee that as an absolute answer.
Well, I'm not sure like I said, but I eliminated all of the other choices and that was the only answer left.
I can see why... I agree! this is still not 100% though....
Mention me when you get a 100% correct answer! I want to know! Please, mention my name. (Put @ in front of my name, w/o space)
OK?
sure
How did the Eastern Woodland Indians differ from Indians in Mexico and Central America? D. Their outlook was more communal than individualistic. I believe I have a pdf about this, basically all the people contributed as much as they could for the group, thus making them have a more communal outlook.
how do you know that?
You sure?
Yes, according to this pdf at least: http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/dl/free/0073406848/565445/Davidson6e_ch01.pdf
can you tell me what part to read?
On the eastern coast of the US were 7 Seneca Tribes, 6 in the north and 1 somewhat southward. They once had a federation of 5 tribes and later a federation of 6. With this information I would say A and possibly D
Which answer did you get @adamconner?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!