Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

What is velocity ? :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The rate of change of speed?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the speed of something in a given direction

OpenStudy (***[isuru]***):

nope

OpenStudy (anonymous):

also velocity = distance divided by time

OpenStudy (anonymous):

velocity is velocity

OpenStudy (***[isuru]***):

velocity is the rate of change of displacement

OpenStudy (***[isuru]***):

velocity is a vector quantity... so it has a direction as well as a magnitude

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thank you guys :)

OpenStudy (***[isuru]***):

speed is the rate of change of distance

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Average velocity - The time-average of the velocity function over a specified time-interval.

OpenStudy (compassionate):

Acceleration is the rate of change and speed. Velocity is a vector; not a scalar. Velocity means directional e.g., North or South, and magnitude. E.g., the 2,000 lbs cargo truck was travel North-West at 75 MPH.

OpenStudy (***[isuru]***):

distance is a scalar quantity.. so it only has a magnitude.. hence speed also has only a magnitude which means speed is also a scalar quantity

OpenStudy (***[isuru]***):

whenever u talk about velocity u have to conciser both direction and magnitude hence u can't define velocity using speed or as rate of change of distence

OpenStudy (***[isuru]***):

@Compassionate I think acceleration is more suitable to define as rate of change of velocity than rate of change of speed

OpenStudy (compassionate):

No. Acceleration doesn't need a direction. It is not the rate of change in velocity. Acceleration is a scalar and velocity is a vector. >He accelerated at 10 mph every 5 minutes. Velocity correlates magnitude and direction. >He accelerated 10 mph every 5 minutes, while traveling 20 MPH; North-South.

OpenStudy (***[isuru]***):

nope

OpenStudy (ash2326):

@Compassionate Acceleration is a vector quantity, it'd be meaningful to understand in which direction acceleration is applied. A plane flying is always under the acceleration due to gravity acting downwards.

OpenStudy (***[isuru]***):

acceleration is a vector quantity for sure

OpenStudy (ash2326):

But the acceleration is not in the same direction as the velocity in this case. We have to explicitly mention the direction to make sense.

OpenStudy (***[isuru]***):

the best example is.. have u ever drawn a graph to represent the vertical component of velocity in a projectile motion under gravitational acceleration ?

OpenStudy (compassionate):

Well - I'm all for flipflopping semantics, and I may be wrong; but I actually have some work I need to attend to. Best of luck, guys.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

It's not semantics at all @Compassionate, it's required... if acceleration were not a vector, explaining something like circular motion would be very difficult, where the acceleration is perpendicular to velocity.

OpenStudy (compassionate):

When you're a nihilist; everything is semantics.

OpenStudy (ash2326):

I think you're being heretic @Compassionate

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Plus acceleration doesn't have to right angles, or parallel, to velocity... it could be at an angle. eg velocity is currently North, but acceleration is north-west, or something like 12 degrees north of east... it definitely requires direction, as it's not always parallel to v (like it is with a car speeding up or slowing down in a straight line)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!