What is velocity ? :)
The rate of change of speed?
the speed of something in a given direction
nope
also velocity = distance divided by time
velocity is velocity
velocity is the rate of change of displacement
velocity is a vector quantity... so it has a direction as well as a magnitude
thank you guys :)
speed is the rate of change of distance
Average velocity - The time-average of the velocity function over a specified time-interval.
Acceleration is the rate of change and speed. Velocity is a vector; not a scalar. Velocity means directional e.g., North or South, and magnitude. E.g., the 2,000 lbs cargo truck was travel North-West at 75 MPH.
distance is a scalar quantity.. so it only has a magnitude.. hence speed also has only a magnitude which means speed is also a scalar quantity
whenever u talk about velocity u have to conciser both direction and magnitude hence u can't define velocity using speed or as rate of change of distence
@Compassionate I think acceleration is more suitable to define as rate of change of velocity than rate of change of speed
No. Acceleration doesn't need a direction. It is not the rate of change in velocity. Acceleration is a scalar and velocity is a vector. >He accelerated at 10 mph every 5 minutes. Velocity correlates magnitude and direction. >He accelerated 10 mph every 5 minutes, while traveling 20 MPH; North-South.
nope
@Compassionate Acceleration is a vector quantity, it'd be meaningful to understand in which direction acceleration is applied. A plane flying is always under the acceleration due to gravity acting downwards.
acceleration is a vector quantity for sure
But the acceleration is not in the same direction as the velocity in this case. We have to explicitly mention the direction to make sense.
the best example is.. have u ever drawn a graph to represent the vertical component of velocity in a projectile motion under gravitational acceleration ?
Well - I'm all for flipflopping semantics, and I may be wrong; but I actually have some work I need to attend to. Best of luck, guys.
It's not semantics at all @Compassionate, it's required... if acceleration were not a vector, explaining something like circular motion would be very difficult, where the acceleration is perpendicular to velocity.
When you're a nihilist; everything is semantics.
I think you're being heretic @Compassionate
Plus acceleration doesn't have to right angles, or parallel, to velocity... it could be at an angle. eg velocity is currently North, but acceleration is north-west, or something like 12 degrees north of east... it definitely requires direction, as it's not always parallel to v (like it is with a car speeding up or slowing down in a straight line)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!