last one >.<
proofs and statements oh man the question looks easy.... I do know that biconditional has two statements one is the original and the other is flipped
@UsukiDoll . I think it might be A ?
biconditional is p ↔ q
maybe, but I haven't taking a proof writing class yet. However, I do know some terminology.
“p is necessary and sufficient for q” “if p then q, and conversely” “p iff q.”
First of all determine what is p and q and then you can see which one doesn't suit.
iff means if and only if Also this book maybe helpful, http://web.karabuk.edu.tr/hakankutucu/Discrete_Mathematics_and_Its_Applications_7th_Edition_Rosen.pdf
Biconditionals are statements in which p-->q and q-->p are both true. The statement and its converse are simultaneously true. To form a biconditional, both a statement and its converse MUST be true. The "bad" conditional here (it is not a biconditional as the question leads us to believe) is C.
Directrix says, (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
can someone here help me please? no one here on the site is helping me :/
Two angles form a linear pair if and only if the angles are adjacent. If two angles form a linear pair, then they are adjacent. (True) But, its converse: If two angles are adjacent, then they form a linear pair is false. Option C is not a biconditional at all. I think the question is what confused us all. @lanana
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!