Ask your own question, for FREE!
Differential Equations 18 Online
OpenStudy (austinl):

Find the solution of the given Initial Value Problem.

OpenStudy (austinl):

\(y''+2y'+2y=h(t)\) \(y(0)=0\) \(y'(0)=1\) \[ h(t)=\{ \begin{array}{ccc} 1,&\pi\le t <2\pi ~~~~~~~~~~~0,&0\le t < \pi \end{array} \]

OpenStudy (austinl):

That is supposed to be a multi-line brace. I wasn't able to get it to display properly. It is supposed to be piecewise style...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

hmm, heaviside seems to come to mind with piecewise stuff

OpenStudy (amistre64):

what pat has you stymied?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

*part ... different keyboard makes my typos even more abundant :/

OpenStudy (austinl):

I am looking at the book and it is showing parts where the h(t) is equal to functions of u sub some number of 't' and I am not sure where they are getting them.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

any foureir stuff in the lesson by chance?

OpenStudy (austinl):

Nope, that isn't for another 4 chapters.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

ut is usually something to do with finding a ... forget what they call it .... function.

OpenStudy (austinl):

I have the answer to the question, it is just a matter of how the heck do I get there :/

OpenStudy (amistre64):

can you attach a picture of the problem and solution?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

BVP, boundary value problem seems to be something to this

OpenStudy (austinl):

I am working on getting the pics on my PC now. Just a moment. Also, it is just an answer, not a worked out solution.

OpenStudy (austinl):

Here we are, problem 2 is my assigned problem.

OpenStudy (austinl):

Just so you know, I only need to do part (a) as well.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

it looks like they are using u(t) as an arbitrary "constant" in the solution

OpenStudy (austinl):

I think so, but then in other examples, they have very specific subscripts which then carry over as part of how to solve the problem. I has me rather confused all around.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

can you provide a very specific example? :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/StepFunctions.aspx heaviside seems applicable

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the subscripts just indicate where the pieces are redefined .... they represent an interval marking

OpenStudy (austinl):

Ok, do you understand this well enough that you could help me through this problem? I am reading through those notes and I can kinda see how they are using the subscripts, now I just need to know how to apply this to this problem.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/IVPWithStepFunction.aspx example 4 looks like a good run thru, without reading it, im assuming they convert the h(t) defined by the piecewise into its heaviside equivalent ..... have to read further to test that hypothesis :)

OpenStudy (austinl):

Ok, so going by their example I get something that looks like this, \(\large{h(t)=1+(-1)u_{2\pi}(t)}\)

OpenStudy (austinl):

Or would it be, \(\large{h(t)=1+(-1)u_{3\pi}(t)}\)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

im having to do a review of the heaviside ... the u parts seems to identify a switch that turns on when its subscript is reached. h(t) = 0 , 0 <= t < pi f(t) = 0 , to start with .................................. h(t) = 1 , pi <= t < 2pi f(t) = 0 + (1)\(u_{pi}(t)\) ................................... h(t) = 0, 2pi <= t since the initial, and the first switch are on; we have a value of 1, we need a value of -1 when the switch is turned on to equal 0 again f(t) = 0 + (1)\(u_{pi}(t)\) - (1)\(u_{2pi}(t)\)

OpenStudy (austinl):

Okay, I think I am following...

OpenStudy (austinl):

In the example, it said something about a "shift", how would that be done with this problem?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

in most cases, the piecewise function is not defined in terms of constant values, but as function. the shifting seems to be a way to stabalize functions .... if im reading it right

OpenStudy (amistre64):

"most switches will not turn on and take constant values. Most switches will turn on and vary continually with the value of t."

OpenStudy (amistre64):

your problem gives us constants so im assuming that its a simpler setup ...

OpenStudy (austinl):

I am reading this stuff, I am not seeing what they are doing to them to get this. It almost seems random, to me anyway.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the heaviside page explains alot of what they are brushing over since it came before this and is assumed to be prior experience :) http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/StepFunctions.aspx

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[L\{u_c(t)\}=\frac{e^{-cs}}{s}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[L\{u_{pi}-u_{2pi}\}=\frac{e^{-pi~s}}{s}-\frac{e^{-2pi~s}}{s}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

we also need to take the laplace of the equation \[L\{y''+2y'+2y\}\] you recall how to take the laplace of that?

OpenStudy (austinl):

\(\large{ s^2Y(s)-y(0)-y'(0)+2(sY(s)-y(0))+2(Y(s))=\frac{e^{-\pi s}}{s}-\frac{e^{-2\pi s}}{s}}\) This look right?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[(s^2Y(s)-sy(0)-y'(0))+2(sY(s)-y(0))+2Y(s)\] filling in the initial conditions give us: \[s^2Y(s)-1+2sY(s)+2Y(s)\] factoring Y(s) \[(s^2+2s+2)Y(s)-1\] and solving for Y(s), gives us ... \[Y(s)=\frac{e^{-pi~s}-e^{-2pi~s}+s}{s(s^2+2s+2)}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes, yes it does :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i think i ran over a 2 someplace in mine

OpenStudy (amistre64):

nah, y=0 so it didnt distribute worth anything ....

OpenStudy (austinl):

Okay.... I have.... \(\displaystyle Y(s)(s^2+2s+2)-1=h(t)\) I think this is similar to what you got... Where would I go from here?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

add 1 and divide the s^2 poly

OpenStudy (austinl):

\(\displaystyle Y(s)=\frac{e^{-\pi x}}{s(s^2+2x+2)}-\frac{e^{-2\pi s}}{s(s^2+2x+2)}+\frac{1}{(s^2+2x+2)}\) This is where I am at....

OpenStudy (amistre64):

good, now we can essentially ignore the e parts and work out the laplace inverses of:\[F(s)=\frac1{s(s^2+2s+2)}\]and\[G(s)=\frac1{s^2+2s+2}\]

OpenStudy (austinl):

On F(s) I believe we can even break that into two different parts as well, can't we?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

a by parts decomp would be fine

OpenStudy (amistre64):

notice that G(s) gives us the e^(-t) sin(t) part of the solution

OpenStudy (austinl):

Yep, I see that.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the partial decomp should provide the rest of the solution they have when we apply it to the upi and -u2pi inverses

OpenStudy (amistre64):

without a lot of experience with heaviside and Laplace, i think that worked out pretty nicely :)

OpenStudy (austinl):

Yeah! Thanks very much, makes more sense to me now anyway :P

OpenStudy (amistre64):

youre welcome :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!