Is this statement correct? Please help quick! Mr. Romano: He says that 2 is a zero of g(x) because synthetic division with 2 results in a remainder of 0.
@austinL
I do believe we are missing some pertinent information.
yea @austinL is right
ok hold on
2.Three party-goers are in the corner of the ballroom having an intense argument. You walk over to settle the debate. They are discussing a function g(x). You take out your notepad and jot down their statements. •Professor McCoy: She says that 2 is a zero of g(x) because long division with (x + 2) results in a remainder of 0. •Ms. Guerra: She says that 2 is a zero of g(x) because g(2) = 0. •Mr. Romano: He says that 2 is a zero of g(x) because synthetic division with 2 results in a remainder of 0. Correct the reasoning of any inaccurate reasoning by the party-goers in full and complete sentences. Make sure you reference any theorems that support your justifications.
that's ok
that is the full problem, but I just need Mr.Romano's.
ok
In terms of the Remainder Theorem if (x – a) is a factor of g(x), then the remainder, when we do synthetic division by x = a will be zero. So here 2 is a zero of g(x).
ok
thanks
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!