Find w(-3) using synthetic substitution w(x)=11x^3-6x^2+2
Sorry it's w(-3)
hmmm do you know how to do synthetic division?
A little bit
ok... let us drop our 1st number and multiply by -3 \(\bf x=-3\implies x+3=0\implies (x+3)=0\\ \quad \\ 11x^3-6x^2+2\implies 11x^3-6x^2+0x+2\quad \textit{arrange in descending order}\\ \quad \\ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrl} -3&|&11&-6&+0&+2\\ &|&&-33\\ \hline\\ &&11&-39 \end{array} \)
so -6-33 = -39 so now let's multiply -3 * -39 and use the product in the following term \(\bf \begin{array}{rrrrrrrl} -3&|&11&-6&+0&+2\\ &|&&-33&117\\ \hline\\ &&11&-39&117 \end{array}\)
and now -3 * 117 to be added to +2, the following term \(\bf \begin{array}{rrrrrrrl} -3&|&11&-6&+0&+2\\ &|&&-33&117&-351\\ \hline\\ &&11&-39&117&-349 \end{array}\)
so we use those coefficients, in our new expression lessened by 1 degree from the original the original was 3rd degree, the quotient will be 2nd degree then \(\bf \begin{array}{rrrrrrrl} -3&|&11&-6&+0&+2\\ &|&&-33&117&-351\\ \hline\\ &&11&-39&117&-349 \end{array}\implies 11x^2-39x+117-\frac{-349}{x+3}\)
the last term is the remainder, so it stays in "division form", or you can just say it's the remainder
Is the last supposed to be - -349? So I would write that like 117- (-349/x+3)
well.... the "remainder" stays as a division, so it'd be written as a fraction
ohh.... ahemm... I see what you mean, well - * - = + .... so could be also written as \(\bf 11x^2-39x+117+\frac{349}{x+3}\) but still as fractional
Oh ok, but I can't type a fractional in word...
check in MS Word under I think is under ..... Format > insert > Equation Word has an equation editor
I think the teacher will understand though, how do I do direct substitution for my next problem? Do I just plug in the number?
well.... you question was " Find w(-3) using synthetic substitution" w(-3) will give you the REMAINDER you simply were asked to get it by using synthetic division so the answer I gather is -349 you can check by doing w(-3) on the equation and using direct substitution like \(\bf w(x)=11x^3-6x^2+2\implies w(-3)=11(-3)^3-6(-3)^2+2\)
that should yield you as the synthetic division did, -349
The direct substitution problem is: Find m(5) using direct substitution: m(x)=x^2+x-1
Do I just plug 5 into the equation?
yeap
So 5^2+5-1= 29. That's the answer?
yes, that means that 29 is the remainder were you to use synthetic diviision
And for the synthetic substitution problem I should write out the entire answer right? Like the whole 11x^2 to the remainder
I'd say yes
I agree. Thanks a lot man! If I have more questions, would you mind if I tag you?
sometimes you may just be asked to write the expression without the remainder and then write the remainder on the side
tis ok
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!