Two calculus questions!:-)
Typing them
Let I[0] be the intesnity of sound at threshold of human hearing. The decibel level of a sound with intesnity I is given by\[dB=10\log_{10}(\frac{ I }{ I_{0} })\]. If the decibel ratings of two sounds differ by 2, how do the intesnities of the sound compare? Round to the nearest 10th
And I'll post the next one after this one is solved:-)
@eashy
\[\Large\bf dB_1=10\log\left(\frac{ I_1 }{ I_{o} }\right)\]\[\Large\bf dB_2=10\log\left(\frac{ I_2 }{ I_{o} }\right)\]\[\Large\bf dB_2-dB_1=2=10\log\left(\frac{ I_2 }{ I_{o} }\right)-10\log\left(\frac{I_1}{I_o}\right)\]Take a look at that a sec, does it make sense what I've done so far?
Makes sense
`how do the intesnities of the sound compare?` Hmm so I think what they're asking for is.. hmm I think they want us to find:\[\Large\bf \frac{I_2}{I_1}\]That will tell us the ratio of the intensities, or how they compare to one another.
So we'll have to use some rule of logs and do some fancy stuff to figure this out.
So we have this equation:\[\Large\bf 2\quad=\quad 10\log\left(\frac{ I_2 }{ I_{o} }\right)-10\log\left(\frac{I_1}{I_o}\right)\]Let's start by dividing each side by 10,\[\Large\bf \frac{2}{10}\quad=\quad \log\left(\frac{ I_2 }{ I_{o} }\right)-\log\left(\frac{I_1}{I_o}\right)\]
A rule of logs:\[\Large\bf\color{#DD4747}{\log a-\log b\quad=\quad \log\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)}\]We can use this rule of logs to simplify the right side of our equation.
Looks a little ugly since we have fractions on fractions :) lol
\[\Large\bf \frac{2}{10}\quad=\quad \log\left[\frac{\left(\dfrac{I_2}{I_o}\right)}{\left(\dfrac{I_1}{I_o}\right)}\right]\]
hmm? :o
Nevermind :O Just keep working haha
So when we divide fractions, there is another way we can rewrite that, yes? :o
\[\Large\bf \frac{a/b}{c/d}\quad=\quad \frac{a}{b}\cdot\frac{d}{c}\]We can flip the bottom fraction and write it as multiplication, sound familiar?
Hmm right
Since that is how you divide fractions :P
So we've got something like this: \[\Large\bf \frac{2}{10}\quad=\quad \log\left[\left(\dfrac{I_2}{I_o}\right)\cdot\left(\dfrac{I_o}{I_1}\right)\right]\]Anddddd, looks like we have a nice cancellation at this point.
I got 1.6 for my answer.
Wait, so cancel out the I[0] and 2/10=log(I[2]*I[1])
And you are incredibly speedy with the equation typing
\[\Large\bf \frac{2}{10}\quad=\quad \log\left[\left(\dfrac{I_2}{\cancel{I_o}}\right)\cdot\left(\dfrac{\cancel{I_o}}{I_1}\right)\right]\]Gives us:\[\Large\bf \frac{2}{10}\quad=\quad \log\left(\dfrac{I_2}{I_1}\right)\]
XD
O sorry I actually meant / not *
1.6? Mmmmmm yah that sounds right! I think we did everything correctly there, hopefully :)
Jesus, long problem! I think I have the answer to this one, so don't need to show work :P The temp of a hot liquid is 100 and the room temp is 70, the liquid cools to 93.9 in 6 minutes. What is the temp after 12 minutes?
So when sounds differ by 2 decibels, the intensity of the larger sound is 1.6 times as .. intense as the other sound :o
My answer: 88
k sec :x checking
Posted that kind of question a few times and nobody knew :((
Hmmm does require us to use Newton's Law of Cooling or something similar? :o Maybe it's simpler than that and I'm just not remembering heh
One last question since I actually skipped it.. http://gyazo.com/25c7718e7d1ce3a2b03edce6b9a5490a
Look familiar? :o \[\Large\bf \frac{dT}{dt}\quad=\quad k(T_a-T)\]
Not at all!
Mmm darn :( I'm not sure how to solve the temperature problem without using calculus stuff. Oh I guess I can at least check your answer of 88 though.
Mmmm yah I think you got it correctly! I came up with 89 degrees.
89?! O no! That was an option!
D:
I'll take your word :-)
That's funny, those numbers are so close together XD I didn't think they'd give you both of those options lol
Options: 88, 89, 87, 90
http://gyazo.com/25c7718e7d1ce3a2b03edce6b9a5490a So for that one, part C, I don't exactly understand how'd you get it to equal 75?
I came up with 89.040.. I thinkkk I did it correctly. I tried to avoid rounding when possible. But you never no :p
Well let's hold off on part C for a moment :P Your earlier parts look a little bonkers.. we should fix that that up first.
Can you accurately figure out what the `initial value` of the stock would be? V(0) = ? I know it's not one of the questions, but it should give you a good idea why your numbers are wayyyyyy off :D
1785.. right?:(
\[\Large\bf V(t)\quad=\quad 51(1-e^{-1.2t})+35\]Plugging in 0 for t,\[\Large\bf V(0)\quad=\quad 51(1-e^{-1.2\cdot0})+35\]Which simplifies the exponential to:\[\Large\bf=\quad 51(1-1)+35\]So what is the initial value of the stock? :x
I SEE WHAT IM DOING WRONG
IVE BEEN PUTTING 35 IN THE BRACKET
Do you? XD oh good
So it's 1.3!
the initial value? :o
Oh no, part C
Grr stop worrying about part C +_+ You really need to fix part A first.
V(1)=70.64 V(12)=86 V'(t)=61.2e^(-1.2t) V(t)=75=1.3 lim-->infinity=86
Mmmm ok good! They all look correct now! :)
I think last question
differentiate x(6.7)^x
Nevermind I got it! :-)
\[\Large\bf \left[x\;6.7^x\right]'\quad=\quad \color{#DD4747 }{(x)'}\;6.7^x+x\color{#DD4747 }{(6.7^x)'}\]
Got it? K cool :x
(6.7^x+ln(6.7)*x*(6.7)^x
Thanks for all of your help!
\c:/ np
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!