Using complete sentences, write an indirect proof proving that if x = 40, then 5 over 6x − 3 ≠ 22.
use a proof by contradiction where if \[x \neq 40 \] then \[\frac{ 5 }{ 6x - 3 } = 22\]
hm.. im actually not 100% sure but this is what i would do... forgot to mention that there is a unique solution such that \[x \in Z\] that satisfies that equation if you negate the statement so you solve for x 5 = 22(6x - 3) 5 = 132x - 66 71 = 132x x = 0.53 but 0.53 is not an integer solution so we have a contradiction here thus if x = 40 then \[\frac{ 5 }{ 6x - 3 } \neq 22\]
woah I am so confused
indirect proof also means a proof by contradiction so you must prove that there is something wrong when you do the opposite of the problem
oh okay so complete sentences would be, Lets say that we switch it around and do x≠40 instead of x≠22. We will do 5 over 6x-3=22 and solve for x. The answer is not an integer solution so we have a contradiction here, thus if x = 40 then.
actually i found an easier way when you negate the statement it becomes if \[x \neq 40 \] then \[(\exists x \in Z : \frac{ 5 }{ 6x - 3 } = 22) \] The parenthesis is suposed to be curly brace so that means if x = 1 then \[\frac{ 5 }{ 6(1) - 3 } = 22\] but you get 1.667 which does not equal 22 so you have a contradiction and the proof is done
or then again what i said the first time works better
because it shows that the unique solution is not an integer solution
Thank you so much
your welcome
so what's the answer then?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!