Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Prove the theorem that if limx→d h(x) = P and limx→d k(x) = Q and h(x) ≥ k(x) for all x in an open interval containing d, then P ≥ Q by using the formal definition of the limit, showing all work.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

limx→d h(x) = P mean h(d)=P limx→d k(x) = Q mean k(d)=Q but h(x) ≥ k(x) for all x in an open interval containing d thus h(d) ≥ k(d) that implies P≥Q

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks but I have to prove using the epsilon delta definition of the limit. Though your proof is very nice and to the point.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

ok il prove it to u using epsilon delta definition of the limit.. brb

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

limx→d (h(x)-k(x)) = P -Q so u need to prove P-Q ≥0. using the def for each epsilon >0 there exist delta >0 ,S.t 0<|x-d|<delta |(h(x)-k(x))-(P-Q)|<epsilon but h(x)-k(x)≥0 (h(x)-k(x))-(P-Q)≥-(P-Q) mmm... ok il try to continue that ltr :\

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that is great start but I keep getting stuck also

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!