Anyone good at radicals? I need help pleaseeeeee
What do you need help with, specifically?
\[3\sqrt{5}-2\sqrt{7}+\sqrt{45}-\sqrt{28}\]
What is the question? Do you need to find an approximation, or do you need to represent it in fractional powers, etc...
blow me
It is asking me to simplify the equation
ok. pay attention to these pairs: 3*root(5) wtih root(45) and 2root(7) and root(28) There's a way to simplify this problem into 2 terms.
\[\sqrt{9}\sqrt{5}\] Think about what these terms can be simplified into... you could easily take the root of 9, or you could multiply 9 and five under the radical.
Ok well i know the square root of 9 is 3!
I don't think there is one fore 5 :o
So... \[3\sqrt{5} = \sqrt{9}\sqrt{5} = \sqrt{45}\] You see? you can do the same thing with the other terms. Pay attention to the sign (plus or neg) as well. these won't cancel.
Now i understand what to do! but do i simplify further?
yes. once the numbers under the radicals are the same, you can add or subtract like terms Ex: \[3\sqrt{3} + 2\sqrt{3} = 5\sqrt{3}\] etc...
because my answer choices are a. \[2\sqrt{12}\] b.\[2\sqrt{2}\] c.6\[6\sqrt{5}-4\sqrt{7}\] d.\[6\sqrt{10}-4\sqrt{14}\]
Yes. One of them is definitely correct. You need to simplify those radicals as far as you can.
If you're still confused about what to do, let me know what's confusing.
Well im trying to see how i can simplify them because 3root5 can not be simplified because nothing goes in them unless it's 1
then 9root5 would be 3root5 because nothing goes in to 5
No. It has a pair. remember? \[3\sqrt{5} = \sqrt{45}\]
so am i simplifying \[3\sqrt{5}=\sqrt{45}\]?
so, let's look at the original problem. I'll take you through it.
\[3\sqrt{5} - 2\sqrt{7} + \sqrt{45} - \sqrt{28}\] Now recognize that the first and third terms are the same: \[\sqrt{45} =\sqrt{9*5} = \sqrt{9}\sqrt{5} = 3\sqrt{5}\]
So since they're both positive, your equation should now look like this: \[3\sqrt{5} - 2\sqrt{7} + 3\sqrt{5} - \sqrt{28}\] now you can add the like terms, and it should look like this: \[6\sqrt{5} - 2\sqrt{7} - \sqrt{28}\]
Now we can do the same thing with the last two terms. Well we have \[2\sqrt{7} \] and \[\sqrt{28}\] if you noticed the pattern... \[\sqrt{28} = \sqrt{7*4} = \sqrt{4}\sqrt{7} = 2\sqrt{7}\] so now the equation should look like; \[6\sqrt{5} - 2\sqrt{7} -2\sqrt{7}\] Do you see how to get there now? There's one more simplification to do...
Yes i think so! now you subtact the terms correct?
so outside the radical, would it be 2?
yes! and a -2(x) - 2x will equal -4x. but instead of x you have root(7)
is the answer b? :)
can you help me with a few more?
no... That's not correct.
wait no! a
My mistake.
Nope :( let me put it a different way. if you had this problem, how would you solve it? \[3x -2x +3x-2x\]
you would subtract the like terms. so 3x-2x would be 1 then the other 3x-2x would also be 1. then add 1+ 1 together and the answer would be 2x?
hello?
sorry. I should've said brb.
No i'ts alright :)
yes. The problem you have is essentially like this: 3x−2y+3x−2y
so, like you just did, but now they don't all combine.
Thats where im getting confused. would i add the x's with the x terms? and the y terms with the y terms?
exactly
so 3x+3x is 6
and 2y + 2y is 4
But now... i can't add 6x + 4y correct?
yes, but remember that they're negative. so it's -4y
and no, you can't add them. They have different variables
ok so now where do i go from there?
well, that's it! the final answer is 6x -4y except x = \[\sqrt{5}\] and y = \[\sqrt{7}\] and in this way, radicals act like variables. you can't add them.
I really hope I'm helping...
Yes you are! thank you so much, you taught me the step by step process and made it easier for me :) can you help me with a different radical problem ?
Sure. Go ahead.
\[\sqrt{5}(8+3\sqrt{6})\]
well, to start, you can distribute the root(5)
what would that give you?
it would be square root of 40
no, the whole equation. type it all out. remember to distribute the root(5) to both terms.
I want to make sure you're getting the steps correct.
oh ok you want me to work out the problem to see if im understanding it. Ok one sec
Ok wait a minute. I just relooked at the problem dont i have to add \[\sqrt{5} + \sqrt{6}\] together? because i got 11, then i added 8+3 together and i also got 11
nope. here, think of it this way: y(8 + 3x)
you can't add the 8 and three together.
you would get 8y + 3xy, right?
right
do you see where this is going?
yes so far, but how am i distributing sq root of 5? i thought i was supposed to be multiplying \[\sqrt{5}(8\] first before i go farther into the problem
so with \[\sqrt{5}(8 + 3\sqrt{6})\] imagine for the purposes of distribution that root(5) is a variable and so is root(6), they can't be added. that's like saying 3*4 = 3+4. It doesn't work. But, they can be multiplied.
so yes, start with root(5) * 8 and then root(5) *3* root(6)
Ok so (5)*8 is 40 then
no
Huh?
Oh wait
Hold on
do i have to find the sq root for 8?
no, treat it like a variable. You don't know root(8), so you just say, \[8\sqrt{5}\]
5 is in the radical, not 8. You just need to group them for now.
it's not tough, just like y(8 + 3x) = 8y + 3xy
just distribute root(5) to both terms like the "y"
Ohhh ok let me see
so, i wrote down the problem and i distributed 5 to 8 which is 40 then 5 to 3 which is 15
Now im trying to see if i add 40 + 15 together?
I dont think i do though because i still have the sq root 6 in my problem
You should've gotten this: \[8\sqrt{5} + 3\sqrt{6}\sqrt{5}\]
the 5 and 8 CANNOT be multiplied directly. One acts like a variable. Let me put it this way: root 5 = 2.236067977..... so if you were to ACTUALLY multiply 8 * root(5), you would get some crazy irrational number like 17.88854382.... So instead, we just keep it as root(5). Think of it this way, you have 8 packs of root(5).
Oh i see. My mistake, i see where you're going with it but now to simplify that would it be \[8\sqrt{5}+3\sqrt{30}\] ?
YES!
now just simplify 3*root(30) one step further...
You think you've got it now?
Yes i do :) but 30 is not a perfect sq? would it be 130?
or 10?
hrm? no Actually, my mistake, there is no further simplification...
That should be the final answer. I hope I helped...
Hahaha i was wondering what was going on! and yes yes you did :) i was able to figure out the answer right? you were BIG help :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!