Understanding double integrals with u substitution and integral by parts. I have the double integral from 0 to 9 and from 0 to 1/9x with the equation being e^(x^2) dy dx. I'm not sure how to properly integrate this.
\[\Large\bf \int\limits_{x=0}^9\quad\int\limits_{y=0}^{\frac{1}{9}x}\; e^{x^2}\;dy\;dx\]So we need to integrate this? Hmm let's see...
Yes, I didn't know how to add the equation nicely. I know to take the first integral it just becomes. \[\int\limits_{0}^{9}ye ^{x ^{2}}\] from 0 to 1/9x which becomes \[\int\limits_{0}^{9}(1/9) xe ^{x ^{2}}\] But I do not know how to integrate that properly.
Oh ok good you've got the first part correct :o
Rearranging things a little gives us, \[\Large\bf \frac{1}{9}\int\limits_{x=0}^9\; e^{\color{#DD4747 }{x^2}}(\color{#3399AA }{x\;dx})\] We want to make the substitution:\[\Large\bf \color{#DD4747 }{x^2=u}\]So what do we get for du?
du is 2x
\[\Large\bf du=2\;\color{#3399AA }{x\;dx}\] Hmm ok good. So we want to solve for our \(\Large\bf \color{#3399AA }{x\;dx}\) so we can replace it in the integral.
Solving for \[xdx\] it becomes \[\frac{ du }{ 2 } = xdx\]
So the equation would be \[\int\limits_{0}^{9}e ^{x ^{2}}\frac{ du }{ 2 }\]
Don't forget to plug u in as well! :O\[\Large\bf \frac{1}{9}\int\limits\limits_{x=0}^9\; e^{\color{#DD4747 }{x^2}}(\color{#3399AA }{x\;dx})\qquad\to\qquad \frac{1}{9}\int\limits\limits_{x=0}^9\; e^{\color{#DD4747 }{u}}\left(\color{#3399AA }{\frac{1}{2}du}\right)\]
Oh right, I forgot, I'm just having problems visualizing how that becomes.\[\int\limits_{0}^{9}\frac{ 1 }{ 2 } e ^{x ^{2}}\] Also, how are you making the equations bigger?
Or in the end I guess it becomes \[\frac{ 1 }{ 18 }\int\limits_{0}^{9}e ^{x ^{2}}\]
You still didn't plug in the u though D:
In the equation editor, at the start you can type any of these to change the size of the text that follows\[\large \text{\large}, \;\Large\text{\Large},\; \LARGE \text{\LARGE},\;\huge\text{\huge},\;\Huge\text{\Huge}\]
So if i plug in the u I get \[\Large \frac{ 1 }{ 18 }\int\limits_{0}^{9}e^udu\] But how does that get rid of the extra x in du?
This is a tough concept to get comfortable with. You're not replacing dx with du. You're replacing the x and dx with something involving du. And we found the derivative to be,\[\Large\bf du=2\;\color{#3399AA }{x\;dx}\]So dividing through by 2 allows us to "solve for" x dx.\[\Large\bf \color{#3399AA }{\frac{1}{2}du=x\;dx}\]
Let's keep in mind that our bounds are still in terms of x,\[\Large \frac{ 1 }{ 18 }\int\limits\limits_{\color{red}{x=0}}^{9}e^udu\] So we have a couple of options: 1. You can find new boundaries in terms of u. 2. You can integrate, and then undo your substitution afterwards and plug in the x boundaries.
If we do the second option when we take the antiderivative of \[\Large e ^{u} du\] it just becomes \[\Large e ^{u}\] and from there we would just undo it by putting the x's in so we would get \[\Large \left( \frac{ 1 }{ 18 } \right)\left( e ^{9} - e ^{0} \right)\] Correct?
\[\Large \frac{ 1 }{ 18 }\int\limits\limits\limits\limits_{\color{red}{x=0}}^{9}e^udu\quad=\quad \frac{1}{18}\left(e^u\right)_{x=0}^9\quad=\quad \frac{1}{18}\left(e^{x^2}\right)_{x=0}^9\] \[\Large =\quad \frac{1}{18}\left(e^{9^2}-e^{0^2}\right)\]
Ah right I forgot the x^2 part, that makes a lot more sense now. Thank You!
\c:/ np
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!