logx + log(x-2) = log3x The first step is to get everything on one side so.. logx + log(x-2) - log3x = 0 What do I do next?
You have my attention ^_^ Now... all these logs have the same base, yes?
Yeah, base of x right?
Base of x? I don't think so. In fact, I don't think it would matter what base these logs have, as long as it's the same. Do you see a small number underneath the logs like this: \[\Large \log_{\color{red}b}x\] or not?
Oh, there's no number.
\[\large logx + \log(x-2) =\log3x\] that's exactly how it is.
Well then, in that case, this can be solved rather quickly and easily, in two ways, in fact ^_^ First, take advantage of this property: \[\Large \log(MN) = \log(M) + \log(N)\]
So log x(x-2) = log 3x
I guess you could do that... and then?
Since there is no base (the small number) it is generally assumed that the base is 10. (I think) Regardless, raise 10 to both sides of the equation... like so: \[\Large \log(M) = \log(N)\\\Large 10^{\log(M)}= 10^{\log(N)}\\\Large \ \\\Large M = N\]
log x(x-2) = log 3x divide by log 3x?.. log x(x-2) / log 3x = 1 x(x-2)/3x = 1 (x-2)/3 = 1 x-2 = 3 x = 5
Answer is correct, but your third line is erroneous ^_^ It should instead be x(x-2)/ 3x = 1 right away, or log [x(x-2)/3x] = 0 But anyway... Here's another way, which, I believe, is less messy :) \[\large \log(x) + \log(x-2)=\log(3x)\]\[\large \log(x)+\log(x-2) = \color{blue}{\log(3) + \log(x)}\] Cancel out log(x) from both sides, we get... \[\Large \log(x-2) = \log(3)\]\[\Large x-2= 3\]\[\Large x = 5 \color{green}{\qquad\checkmark }\]
Thank you! That makes more sense lol. Forgot about how you can turn log (3x) into log (3) + log (x) .
That doesn't always work, mind you, the way you did it was more...general, save for that tiny error in the middle. Nice work, anyway. ^_^
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!