In the Converse of the Angle Bisector Theorem, why is it important to say that the point must be in the interior of the angle? HELP ME??
Imagine this picture: |dw:1386284978443:dw| Here, you can't ever create a 90 degree angle, It MUST be in the interior, otherwise there is no way to create a perpendicular line.
Im So Lost Ugh!
Alright, let's work through it. Tell me what the converse of the angle bisector theorem states.
That Lol
It says that for a point P, if it is in the interior of the angle, and equidistant from both lines, it is a bisector. XD or just post it.
What Do I Right For The Answer. Lol Im Lost! Like OMG! Haha & Yeahhh I Did That:p
Alright, we always need at least one 90 degree angle to tell distance.
I Got That. I Think Lol.
Alright, now two more things, First off, you can't get a perpendicular line from the exterior of the angle. It's just not possible. Second off, a bisector of an angle is characterized by cutting the interior of the angle in half, meaning it can't be on the exterior.
Does that make sense?
|dw:1386285681490:dw|
You see what I'm saying?
Let me clarify on that picture I drew earlier, it was wrong|dw:1386286398287:dw| See? It never intersects with the rays of the angle.
Um I Guess...
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!