CALC 2
Can you please help me solve the first one ? https://www.dropbox.com/s/j0zdknkp2vi7y5f/Screenshot%202013-12-14%2015.25.04.jpg
@hero
@skullpatrol
@atlas
@AllTehMaffs
Can you tell if it's a geometric or arithmetic series?
Well, hint, I don't believe that any of the series in the set you gave are arithmetic. So, in any case, since it's geometric, that means you can set it to the form \[ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} a(r)^{k-1}\] and if r>1 it diverges if r<1 it converges to the sum \[ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} a(r)^{k-1}=a\frac{1}{(1-r)}\]
How can you differentiate a geometric from an arithmetic serie @AllTehMaffs
An arithmetic sequence is where the difference between terms is the same, ie 1+3+5+7+9 etc... They share a common difference. A geometric term shares a common ratio, ie \[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{8}+....\] etc. They're all a term to some power. This example is a geometric series, because it fits the latter form \[1-\frac{3}{4}+\frac{9}{16}.....\] So, looking at the series \[ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \left( -\frac{3}{4} \right)^{k-1}\] can you squish it into \[ \sum a(r)^n\] ?? a=? r=? n=k-1 <---- this is trivial
wait "A geometric term shares a common ratio" , do you mean that A geometric series must have fractions ? basically what do you mean by "common ratio" ? which 2 numbers would have a common ratio ?
consider it as \[\sum_{a}^{b} =\int\limits_{a}^{b}dx\]
a sum can be considered as an integral as well ?? Also is that the reason this serie so considered "geometric"? http://screencast.com/t/xEyd3Qfftl7o
Throw out all those whose terms do not approach zero. 6 and 14 are Divergent. Accept all that are obviously Geometric. 3, 4, and 12 Converge Find those that are more subtly Geometric: 5 and 13 Converge What's left?
I dont understand what meaning is underlined under the word "geometric"
I am pretty confused I guess
is this geometric because it has a power that includes this k variable?
So first, to make it less confusing, the k is just for counting, it's not an unknown. it's for distinguishing the individual terms when you write it out. Second, it's a "geometric series" not because it's a fraction, but because you can multiply each successive term by a common factor (-3/4) ie \[ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}1\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)^{k-1}=1\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)^0+1\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)^1+1\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)^2+1\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)^3..... + \cancel{1\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)^{\infty}}^0\] \[=1+1\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)+1\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)+1\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right).......\] So each term you add is the previous term multiplied by -3/4
Geometric sequence: \[a_n=a_1r^{n-1}\]\(a_1\) = first term, r = common ratio
so here the common r is -¾ or +¾ ?????
agh it has to be -3/4
aah*
I see
yup yup yup! a=1 r=-3/4
since the negative is inside the exponential, it makes a big difference to keep that negative sign on the r - even powers give a positive number, and odd powers give a negative number.
so this converges
buts whats it's sum ?
yup yup yup. The sum is given by \[=\frac{a}{1-r}\] super slick.
ok but hold on, is that some kind of a formula ??
yeah, that's just the formula for the sum of a converging infinite geometric sequence
if you have (for a=1) the \[sum=s=1+r^1+r^2+r^3+....\] , then multiply the sum by r \[r (sum) = rs=r^1+r^2+r^3+....\], then \[s-rs=1+(r-r)+(r^2-r^2)+(r^3-r^3)+......=1\] because every term in s gets cancelled by a term in rs except for 1 (the first term) following through gives \[s(1-r)=1\] \[s=\frac{1}{1-r}\]
thanks a lot
^_^ Glad I could help!
so I can use this exact thing basically for every geometrical infinite eerie ? https://www.dropbox.com/s/q0oywr1u24nkmpx/Screenshot%202013-12-14%2017.06.53.jpg
If it converges, most definitely. It's really, really cool I think!!
:D I see
^_^
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!