How to do this ? Medal will be awarded
Using complete sentences, write an indirect proof proving that if x = 40, then 2 over 5x − 7 ≠ 13.
I really need help please
If x = 40 - Then 2 over 5x − 7 ≠ 13 <--- You use 40 and replace It for x In the proof.
2 over 5x − 7 ≠ 13 ----> 2/5(40) ≠ 13 ---> 16 ≠ 13 <---
so step 1is 2/5(40) ≠ 13
To start an indirect proof u will state the opposite of what ur trying to prove
So 5x-7=13
@nikato that is how you start the proof
Oops, it's 2/5x-7
Oh ok
so how does the x=40 fit with this
But u said indirect proof @arilove1d
\[\huge \frac{2} {5x - 7} \ne 13 , ~\text{for}~x = 40\] \[\huge \frac {2}{5(40) - 7} \ne 13 ~~~~~~ \frac{2}{200-7} \ne 13\] \[\huge \frac {2}{193} \ne 13 \]
writing in latex without the equation editor is tedious..
In your paragraph write that when you substitute with x = 40, you get 2/193 , which is not equal to 13, therefore .....(blah blah blah and so on)
yeah its an indirect proof . Im sonfused on how you make one i know you start it with t he opposite of what you want to prove
*confused
Ok, so with what I said above. After that when u write in complete sentences how to find x with the opposite equation
Wouldnt it be 2/5(40)-7=13
U should have two different answers. And then say something by contradiction of the given x=40 and the answer u got, therefore 2/5x-7 doesn't equal 13. Something like that I guess
Yea, or u could do what's just did. And said becuz they are not equal, there's a condtradition
Thank you @nikato
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!