Explain why it is not valid to use the Mean Value Theorem. When the hypotheses are not true, the theorem does not tell you anything about the truth of the conclusion. Find the value of c, or show that there is no value of c that makes the conclusion of the theorem true.
\[f(x)=x ^{1/3}, [-1,1]\]
What in the world is this asking me to do?
do u know what is the mean value theorem
The Mean Value Theorem is one of the most important theoretical tools in Calculus. It states that if f(x) is defined and continuous on the interval [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b), then there is at least one number c in the interval (a,b) (that is a < c < b) such that \[f'(c) = \frac{f(b) - f(a)}{b-a} \]
to support huneya only. Not interfere the guiding
thanks i know but this problem is to plug it in the formula i did this yesterday in class that why.
for this particular problem f(x) = x^1/2 [-1.1] it's NOT defined on this interval.---> the Mean theorem fails
|dw:1388632756366:dw|
yes true
DAT SIT
the answer to the question is NO, because there is a vertical tangent at x=0
its \[x ^{1/3}\]
but still follows same thing you said right, not continuous at x=0?
x^1/3 right than the answer when u put it the mean value is a error and than u have to justify it so u then graph it and find that there is a vertical tangent at x=0
If the mean value theorem does not hold for a case does that mean there is not c that satisfies the problem or do you have to do some other method to determine that?
the value of c is error or 0 at the interval [-1,1]
okay got it
ok
maybe i am doing someone wrong but i do get a value for c?
show me ur work
f(1)=1 and f(-1)=-1 f'(c)=1 f'(x)=1/3x^-2/3 set that equal to 1 and i get c equals around .19
ok thsi is not use the mean value theorem thats y
i dunno, i just followed the steps in my textbook
it looks like x^1/3 is continuous
and differentiable over all real numbers so therefore the MVT would work?
do u use the book calculus graphical, numerical, algebraic third edition
no, calculus early transcendental functions 4th edition
by smith and minton............. absolutely terrible book
i use a different book but is the same problem in my book and the answer is as i mention above
i dont see how you get a vertical tangent at 0, the function seems to be continuous there and the left and right sided limits agree as x goes to 0?
it meets all the wickets for a function to be continuous and is also differentiable in that interval so i am not seeing why the MVT does not apply
find the derivative of and then see why
gotcha, i was thinking that a value exits for that interval when plugged into the derivative. But I should have been looking at the derivative of the function over that interval, if you get what i am saying
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!