What is the assumption needed to begin an indirect proof of the following statement? "A team is as strong as its weakest member." A team is as strong as its weakest member. A team is as strong as its strongest member. A team is not as strong as its weakest member. A team is not as strong as its strongest member.
y believe its d
I do too, you can't use a to prove a, b and c are not acurate
yeah thanks i just wanted to make sure can i show you a few more @ehuman
I'm here, let's look at them
I'm better with math, but logic statements are fun to figure out
Stephanie is doing an indirect proof with three given statements and one conclusion. How many of these statements could be false based on her assumption to contradict the assumption and prove the original conclusion? One Two One, two, or three Three
i think its 2 or 3
twisted wording on this one.
i know
I can't even guess on this one sorry
no prob
Angie did the following proof in her logic class. Which step in the indirect proof did she do incorrectly? Prove: 12 is divisible by 6. Step 1: Assume that 12 is not divisible by 6. Step 2: 2 times 6 is equal to 12. 12 divided by 6 is 2. Step 3: 12 is not divisible by 6 Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 Steps 1 and 2
its step 2 right
wait i think its 3
3
ok last one The following is an indirect proof of the Multiplication Property of Equality: For real numbers a, b, and c, if a = b, then ac = bc. Assume ac ≠ bc. According to the given information, _____. By the Division Property of Equality, one can divide the same number from both sides of an equation without changing the equation. Therefore, ac over c does not equal bc over c. Through division, the c's cancel and a ≠ b. This contradicts the given information so ac = bc. Which statement accurately completes the proof? ac = bc ac ≠ bc a = b a ≠ b
if you know how to do it explain it to me don't just give me the answer please ?
this one im clueless
|dw:1389546357684:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!