The solution I get is not listed? (-1)

Question

lena772 · Answer

attachment

ganeshie8 · Answer

how did u get -1 ?

primeralph · Answer

g(x) = 3, so g(anything) = 3.
Yeah, how did you get -1?

anonymous · Answer

I see how you got -1. You substituted 3 into the x. That isn't exactly how the problem should be solved. You  can try g of f

ganeshie8 · Answer

ahh you did f(g(x)) instead of g(f(x))

anonymous · Answer

g(3) = 3. What you need to do is substitute f(x) multiplied with it.
Does that make sense to you?

primeralph · Answer

I dislike it when people ask for help and don't respond.
I'm out. Good luck.

lena772 · Answer

sorry, I have an ie browser which takes forever to refresh... and yes Kirby and ganeshie are right.

anonymous · Answer

Would I be wrong in saying that the problem should follow as 3(f(x)
You would multiply 3 into the f(x) equation to get your solution.

primeralph · Answer

@KirbyLegs  What are you doing?

primeralph · Answer

As I said, g(anything) = 3, so no matter what f(x) is, g(f(x)) = 3.

ganeshie8 · Answer

i like the way prime kept it  :-
g(x) = 3
so,
g(anything) = 3
g(jessica alba) = 3

anonymous · Answer

Ah so because there is no variable for f(x) to go into from g(x)

The answer is simply the constant of g(x) which is 3

primeralph · Answer

Yeah, works for Jessica Alba too.