Look at the argument below. Which of the following symbolic statements shows the set-up used to find the validity of the argument? If it is July, then I am living at the lake. I am not living at the lake. Therefore, it is not July. p: It is July. q: I am living at the lake. A) [(p → q) ∧ ~q] ∴ p B)[(p → q) ∧ ~q] ∴ ~p C)[(p → q) → q] ∴ p D)[(p → q) ∧ q] ∴ p
do you understand the notation here?
no i do not.
∴ means therefore ~ means not. ^ means AND → means IMPLIES
so, what do you think the first statement " If it is July, then I am living at the lake." would be translated as?
well i think the answer would be D but im not to sure
What leads you to think the answer is D? I thought you said you didn't understand the notation
after looking at the notation, im trying to figure out the answer
here, try to translate the statements one by one. what do you think the first statement If it is July, then I am living at the lake. can be translated as?
wouldn't the first part just stay the same as [(p → q)
okay. What about the second part? I am not living at the lake.
∧ ~q]
okay. so we have [(p → q) ∧ ~q]
"Therefore, it is not July." what would that be?
[(p → q) ∧ ~q] ∴ ~p
yeah
btw, that kind of argument is called modus tollens
thank you so much :)!
no problem :)
Which of the following truth tables shows the statement ~p → ~q ? p q ~p ~q ~p → ~q T T F T T T F F F T F T T T T F F T F F p q ~p ~q ~p → ~q T T F F T T F F T F F T T F F F F T T T p q ~p ~q ~p → ~q T T F F F T F F T T F T T F F F F T T T p q ~p ~q ~p → ~q T T F F T T F F T T F T T F F F F T T T
oh dear. post a new question for that one :)
haha alright :D sounds good i ment too lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!