if log(subscript a) x=7, what is the value of log(subscript a) (a/x^2) ?
\[\Large\bf\sf \log_ax=7,\qquad\qquad \log_a\frac{a}{x^2}=?\]
We can apply some rules of logs to help us out!
I'm all ears
Here is an important rule to remember:\[\Large \bf\sf \color{orangered}{\log\left(\frac{b}{c}\right)\quad=\quad \log (b)-\log (c)}\]
So that will allow us to take the first step in rewriting our expression.\[\Large\bf\sf \log_a\frac{a}{x^2}\quad=\quad \log_aa-\log_ax^2\]
Understand how I applied the rule there? :o
I think so :) ... I'm taking notes.
So where do I go from here?
Whenever the `base` of a log matches the `contents` of the log, the result is 1. If you don't understand why, then it might seem a little weird. You can punch it into your calculator to check. Like if you try \(\Large\bf\sf log_{10}10\) you should get 1. So we can simplify the first term down.
\[\Large\bf\sf \log_aa-\log_ax^2\quad=\quad 1-\log_ax^2\]
oh ok
Another important log rule:\[\Large\bf\sf \color{royalblue}{\log(b^c)\quad=\quad c \log(b)}\]Allows us to bring an exponent down in front of the log as a coefficient.
Understand how we can apply this to the 2 on x^2?
Yes 2 log x
Ok good! \[\Large\bf\sf 1-2\log_ax\]Lemme color it a sec, make something will jump out at you.\[\Large\bf\sf 1-2\color{#DD4747 }{\log_ax}\]That is our expression so far. Here is the initial information they gave us:\[\Large\bf\sf \color{#DD4747}{\log_ax=7}\]
the coloring really helps!
Do you see where we can plug in our 7?
yes so 1-2(7)
Yesss, good good good.
-13?
Yay good job! \c:/
Thanks:) Wait so that's the final answer?
This is a pretty tough problem. You have to use 3 different log rules, then use the initial data. It's a bit of a thinker!
Ya that should be right :o
Jeez
Ok because I thought I had to plug it into log a (a/x^2)
and I didn't square anything...
They gave a nice simple number for log_a(x). So the idea was: we wanted to twist things around to try and get a log_a(x) out of that messy thing :o
ok, so I don't have to use the second part of the problem? sorry I'm just confused :)
Second part of the problem? You mean this?\[\Large\bf\sf \log_a\frac{a}{x^2}=?\]
yes
We did use that silly! That's what we `started` with. And widdled it down doing some steps:\[\Large\bf\sf \log_a\frac{a}{x^2}\quad=\quad\log_aa-\log_ax^2\quad=\quad1-2\log_ax\quad=\quad1-2(7)\]
Oh wow, yes we did.... my bad :)
Can you help me with one more problem?
Mm I can try -_- gotta hit the sack soon. So late!
Explain the algebraic process of how functions can be shown to be inverses. Use the functions below to verify your explanation. f(x) = 3x-1/x+2 and g(x) = 2x+1/3-x
Ok I REALLY appreciate all your help! You are a life saver!!! And I know I'm tired too!
\[\Large\bf\sf f(x)=\frac{3x-1}{x+2},\qquad\qquad g(x)=\frac{2x+1}{3-x}\]Let's fiddle around with f(x) and try to show that g(x) is it's inverse. We'll start by letting f(x) = y.\[\Large\bf\sf y=\frac{3x-1}{x+2}\]
ok
To find the inverse of this function, we `swap/trade` the x's and y's in the equation.\[\Large\bf\sf x=\frac{3y-1}{y+2}\]
To find the inverse function, we now need to solve for y.
ok
It'll take a few tricky algebra steps to get our y.
We'll multiply both sides by (y+2)
\[\Large\bf\sf x(y+2)=3y-1\]
ok, with u so far
We'll distribute the x to each term in the brackets.
xy + 2x
Ok good.\[\Large\bf\sf xy+2x=3y-1\]
Now we want to get both of the `y` terms on the same side. So let's subtract 3y from each side.
ok
No no no, let's not do that. Let's subtract xy from each side actually... It'll work out a little nicer.
-3y + xy + 2x= -1?
ok
so what does our equation look like now?
So I guess that gives us this for now: \[\Large\bf\sf 2x=3y-xy-1\]
ok
We'll add 1 to each side,\[\Large\bf\sf 2x+1=3y-xy\]Then we'll want to `factor out` a y from each term on the right.
ok
\[\Large\bf\sf 2x+1=y(3-x)\]Understand the factoring ok?
pooh yes, I was doing in wrong on my paper, but yes i see
*oooh
lol XD dat pooh bear
:)
So to get y alone, let's divide the junk over to the other side.
ok so 2x+1/y = 3-x?
Woops! We don't want to divide the y to the left side silly! We're trying to get y alone. I was referring to the `(3-x)` as the junk connected to y.
ok, so what is our equation now?
2x+1/3-x=y
got it
\[\Large\bf\sf \frac{2x+1}{3-x}=y\]Yes, good good. Our final step is to rewrite y as \(\Large\bf\sf f^{-1}(x)\). This new y that we've found now represents the inverse function of f, since we swapped the x's and y's
oooohhhh and this equals the other equation we were given!!! so they are inverses of each other, right?
Yesss, good! So we've just found out that \(\Large\bf\sf f^{-1}(x)=g(x)\) Which means f and g are inverse functions of one another! :O
I cannot even began to thank you enough for all your help!!!!!
lol np :3 go to bed bunny it's late!! +_+ err at least in this part of the world it is. :P
No its past midnight here! Thx a million!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!