Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 21 Online
OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

Trivia - Tension Trick

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

Let's say - we have to find a relation between the acceleration vectors of the blocks in the diagram (see attachment). To keep it simple; don't consider torque (for m5). Although it won't be much of a trouble; but I think the system is already pretty complicated. Note: All pulleys and strings are ideal.

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

To use the trick method; first draw all the tension vectors and acceleration vectors (corresponding to each mass). Then according to Tension Trick - \[\Sigma (T⋅a)=0\]

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

Now, try to find a proof for the above ^^ trick. PS: You can use a single pulley system.

OpenStudy (vincent-lyon.fr):

Can you choose a simple example to show us? I do not understand what a represents.

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

'T' represents Tension vector 'a' represent acceleration vector For those who can't see the equation - Σ(T⋅a)=0 ^^ Its a dot product :)

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

Consider the simple pulley system - According to Tension Trick - (-T*A) + (T*a) = 0 implies A = a

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

^^ @Vincent-Lyon.Fr

OpenStudy (vincent-lyon.fr):

But A = a is a simple consequence of kinematics, no forces need to be implied to prove it. Sorry, I still do not understand. What if a pulley has its centre moving too? Does this trick help?

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

Yes, it is obvious here. But what needs to be noted is - the trick will work irrespective of what arrangement of pulleys do we use.

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

Like in my last question - http://openstudy.com/users/lastdaywork#/updates/52dbfe05e4b003c643a019fb I could easily say that A = a (and save a lot of lengthy calculation) Was it obvious there too ??

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

So, if the trick is independent of the arrangement of pulleys; it must have a general proof, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

who needs so many pulleys in the first place? :D :D..

OpenStudy (vincent-lyon.fr):

"I could easily say that A = a (and save a lot of lengthy calculation) Was it obvious there too ??" Of course it is obvious since the thread cannot be extended. Noneed of lengthy calculation to state that.

OpenStudy (vincent-lyon.fr):

"who needs so many pulleys in the first place? :D :D.. " It's only for the sake of making you mad, Mashy! ;-)

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

Conserving the length of thread might become complicated in some cases. I can upload some; if you are interested :) @Mashy : It really is to make people mad :D

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

BTW, the answer is simply the fact that - in an ideal pulley system; net work done by tension (at any instance) is always zero. You can involve torque and spring and all other stuff but the above fact survives :)

OpenStudy (lastdaywork):

And yes - "What if a pulley has its centre moving too? Does this trick help? " It will still work (as long as the pulley is mass-less)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!