Ask your own question, for FREE!
Algebra 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Write an inequality for the graph, please help me understand.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@jim_thompson5910 , could you help?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Do you remember which function has a V shape?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I do not, I don't remember anything lol. If you don't mind just explaining it a bit, then hopefully I catch on, if that's too much to ask. It's okay.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Lemme see if the drawing tool is working today, if not it might be difficult to go into detail.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Grr it's still broken >:O annoying.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Start with the function \(\Large\bf\sf y=x\) Remember what that one looks like? It's a straight line going upwards at a 45 degree angle, through the origin.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

The absolute function: \(\Large\bf\sf y=|x|\) takes any negative x values and flips them up to make them positive instead.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/ii4wfsbfcm

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So the absolute function takes that red line on the left and flip it's upward to be positive instead. The absolute gives us that nice v shape.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\Large\bf\sf y=|x|\]So we'll start with this. We'll have to make some horizontal and vertical translations to get it to match up with our picture.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

In the picture, the `vertex`, (middle point) has been shifted from (0,0) to what appears to be aboutttttt (5,1), does that sound about right? :o

zepdrix (zepdrix):

I'm talking about the very base point of our icecream cone :O

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah it does Lol .

zepdrix (zepdrix):

For our vertical translation we'll just add 1 to our function.\[\Large\bf\sf y=|x|+1\]That will move it up 1. Do you remember how to deal with horizontal shifts? It's a little bit different than with vertical.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah a little, it seems very familar I feel like I have it in my notes somewhere lol.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Fine fine fine I won't make you dig. For horizontal shifts, we make the `opposite` adjustment. So in this case we'll `subtract` 5 from x, since our vertex needs to move to positive 5.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\Large\bf\sf y=|x-5|+1\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So there is function. Hopefully that makes a bit of sense. I know moving stuff around can be a bit tricky. Now we need to deal with the shading.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You're awesome, Im writing that down now. So what's with the shading?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

The shading let's us know that we'll need to write this an `inequality`, no longer using an equals sign. The shading is telling us to include all of the values `larger` than the line we came up with.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Look back at our function, the right side represents the line. We want the y values which are `larger` than the line. We want y `to be larger than` the line. Can you think of which inequality sign we might use? :O

OpenStudy (anonymous):

umm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Didn't mean to post that still thinking sorry lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what about = ?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Hmm = is no good. That will give us all of the y values that are equal to the line. We want all of the y values that are "greater than" the line. See how the area `above` the line is shaded?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ohh >

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Ah good! That will work! \[\Large\bf\sf y\gt\text{the line}\] \[\Large\bf\sf y>|x-5|+1\] Now we have one more thing to deal with.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Should we use a strict inequality \(\Large\bf\sf \gt\) or the other one \(\Large\bf\sf \ge\) ?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\(\Large\bf\sf \gt\) Strict means, we only want the values larger than the line. Strict will exclude the values which fall ON the line. When we exclude the values on the line, we draw a `dotted line` for our function. \(\Large\bf\sf \ge\) If we're `including` values along our line, we instead draw a `solid line`. This symbol means, all of the values larger than ( the shaded region ), or equal to ( values along the line ).

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So does our v shape have a dotted or solid line?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

um, yes?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Don't let the dots inside the shaded area confuse you. We don't care about the shaded part right now. So the line part of our V, is it `dotted` or a `solid` line?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

It's not a yes or no question silly! :3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh lol, gesh man only if you knew the day I had. This screen is giving me a headache lol.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

XD

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Hmm it looks like the V is a solid line in the picture, yes? So we'll want to use the inequality that has the little equal line under it. We want to `include` values along that line. That's what the solid line is telling us.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So we'll want to use the \(\Large\bf\sf \ge\) symbol. Not the \(\Large\bf\sf \gt\).

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\Large\bf\sf y\ge|x-5|+1\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ohhh I see lol.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/4tg2wtkgzl Here's another look at it. A nice graphing utility to check your work.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So that would be our final answer. I know it's a bit tough, lot of little things to remember.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, yes it is. Thanks alot

zepdrix (zepdrix):

np :3

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!