Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Linear transformations : Show that... see attachment

OpenStudy (anonymous):

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Could you recall what linearly independent means?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Linear independence is just such that any one vector in the set, isn't a linear combination of the other vectors? I still do not know how to prove, that after a linear transformation, all vectors are still independent

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Well then, let's see, shall we? We know that v1, v2, v3... vr are linearly independent, right?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Still there? You need to pay attention to the details here...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, so let's check their respective images under the linear transformation... Consider T(v1), T(v2), T(v3), ... T(vr) catch me so far?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, so, let's proceed by contradiction :) Suppose there is a linear combination of these vectors that produce the zero vector: a1T(v1) + a2T(v2) + ... + arT(vr) = 0 still with me?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Well, what do we know about the linear transformations (such as T) We know that constants can move in and out of the transformation: aT(v) = T(av) right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yep

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, so this equation a1T(v1) + a2T(v2) + ... + arT(vr) = 0 May be written as: T(a1 v1) + T(a2 v2) + ... + T(ar vr) = 0 yes?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Well, maybe you can proceed from here? Perhaps use the other property of linear transformations...

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

@dw3 well?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I don't think I understand

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, so another property of linear transformations (which you forgot -_-) is this: T(u) + T(v) = T(u+v)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

T(a1v1+⋯+arvr)=0 But what does this mean :/

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Well, in a linear transformation, ONLY the zero vector could be mapped to the zero vector, right?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Here, let me prove it. Suppose we want to find T(0) T(0) = T(v - v) = T(v) - T(v) = 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ah! i get it

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So, This implies that a1v1 + a2v2 + ... arvr = 0 And this is...?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

linearly dependent?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

a contradiction, silly :> Didn't we just assume that v1, v2, ...vr are linearly independent?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh, >.< Thanks a lot!

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Wait a minute, there might be a slight problem....

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

We have to assume that the transformation T is at least injective, otherwise, this won't work....

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!