Radius of Convergence...
@thomaster please help.. I don't know if it's right but my guess is that the Radius of Convergence of the sum of the two series is at least as large as r... Am I right? If it is I don't know how to prove it. just my guess..
@phi , @ash2326
I could be wrong but the way I see it is this: sum(a_n x^n) converges if -r<x<r sum(b_n x^n) converges if -s<x<s sum[(a_n+b_n)x^n] can be written as sum(a_n x^n) + sum(b_n x^n) it seems intuitive to me that this will converge only if both series converge, and since s>r, then if -s<x<s both series should converge, which implies their sums converge, so the radius of convergence should be the larger of the two radii; s
what @TuringTest said lowest will work
oh you said largest, i would say smallest
after thinking about it for a moment I realize my logic suggests the opposite, the radius should be the smaller so that they both converge
yeah just realized it lol
so the radius of convergence should be the smallest of the two?
think about it, you are with me up until sum[(a_n+b_n)x^n] can be written as sum(a_n x^n) + sum(b_n x^n) right?
I got confused at the convergence part..sorry..
you mean you don;t understand convergence in general?
nope, i don't mean that. I mean the logic in which the radius of convergence of the sum of the given power series should be the smallest. because the only part that I am sure that it is convergent is when -r<x<r. I am not sure if the sum of the other part of the power series will converge at the part x E (r, s).
you mean you are not sure whether sum[(a_n+b_n)x^n] will converge for r<x<s and -s<x<-r ?
that is, x between r and s
yeah, kind of like that... sorry _ _
no worries do you see that we can rewrite sum[(a_n + b_n) x^n] = sum(a_n x^n) + sum(b_n x^n) ?
yep, we can distribute the summation...
ok, and the right will only converge if both series converge i.e. if one of the two series on the right diverges, the whole thing diverges, agreed?
agree..
so, if r<x<s, then we have that x>r, which means that the first summation, sum(a_n x^n), diverges
same for -s<x<-r, if x<-r then the first summation diverges, so the largest radius at which they BOTH converge is the smaller of the two, r
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!