Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (darkprince14):

Radius of Convergence...

OpenStudy (darkprince14):

OpenStudy (darkprince14):

@thomaster please help.. I don't know if it's right but my guess is that the Radius of Convergence of the sum of the two series is at least as large as r... Am I right? If it is I don't know how to prove it. just my guess..

OpenStudy (darkprince14):

@phi , @ash2326

OpenStudy (turingtest):

I could be wrong but the way I see it is this: sum(a_n x^n) converges if -r<x<r sum(b_n x^n) converges if -s<x<s sum[(a_n+b_n)x^n] can be written as sum(a_n x^n) + sum(b_n x^n) it seems intuitive to me that this will converge only if both series converge, and since s>r, then if -s<x<s both series should converge, which implies their sums converge, so the radius of convergence should be the larger of the two radii; s

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what @TuringTest said lowest will work

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh you said largest, i would say smallest

OpenStudy (turingtest):

after thinking about it for a moment I realize my logic suggests the opposite, the radius should be the smaller so that they both converge

OpenStudy (turingtest):

yeah just realized it lol

OpenStudy (darkprince14):

so the radius of convergence should be the smallest of the two?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

think about it, you are with me up until sum[(a_n+b_n)x^n] can be written as sum(a_n x^n) + sum(b_n x^n) right?

OpenStudy (darkprince14):

I got confused at the convergence part..sorry..

OpenStudy (turingtest):

you mean you don;t understand convergence in general?

OpenStudy (darkprince14):

nope, i don't mean that. I mean the logic in which the radius of convergence of the sum of the given power series should be the smallest. because the only part that I am sure that it is convergent is when -r<x<r. I am not sure if the sum of the other part of the power series will converge at the part x E (r, s).

OpenStudy (turingtest):

you mean you are not sure whether sum[(a_n+b_n)x^n] will converge for r<x<s and -s<x<-r ?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

that is, x between r and s

OpenStudy (darkprince14):

yeah, kind of like that... sorry _ _

OpenStudy (turingtest):

no worries do you see that we can rewrite sum[(a_n + b_n) x^n] = sum(a_n x^n) + sum(b_n x^n) ?

OpenStudy (darkprince14):

yep, we can distribute the summation...

OpenStudy (turingtest):

ok, and the right will only converge if both series converge i.e. if one of the two series on the right diverges, the whole thing diverges, agreed?

OpenStudy (darkprince14):

agree..

OpenStudy (turingtest):

so, if r<x<s, then we have that x>r, which means that the first summation, sum(a_n x^n), diverges

OpenStudy (turingtest):

same for -s<x<-r, if x<-r then the first summation diverges, so the largest radius at which they BOTH converge is the smaller of the two, r

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!