Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

(a,b) is an integer solution for 45x-28y=130 How can we prove that a is an even number and (b) is a multiple of 5 ?

Parth (parthkohli):

Look at the right hand side. It is equivalent to \(0 \pmod{5}\).

Parth (parthkohli):

Thus, the left-hand side has to be \(0 \pmod{5}\) as well. Now, that means \(45x - 28y \equiv 0 \pmod 5\) implying that \(28y \equiv 0 \pmod{5}\). 28 itself is not divisible by 5, so it is obvious that \(y\) has to.

Parth (parthkohli):

For the first part, use the mod 2.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and mod 2 for x, fairly enough thank you

Parth (parthkohli):

You are welcome!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ParthKohli could you please tell me how do i answer to the qs it says what are the reminders of n^2 divided by 4 ?

Parth (parthkohli):

Ah. Do we have to prove the result as well? While we are on it, look at the remainders when n is even and when n is odd.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes 0 when it's even and 1 when odd

Parth (parthkohli):

Yes, that's right :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Actually i have big problem with understanding what Congruence is :)

Parth (parthkohli):

Congruence in modular arithmetic? I had trouble in that once as well. Well, if you say that \(a \equiv 3 \pmod{8}\), it means that \(a\) will get the same remainder when divided by \(8\) as \(3\) does.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mmm r[3/8]=r[a/8]

Parth (parthkohli):

\[19 \equiv 22 \pmod{3} \]The above is true because both of them get the same remainder when divided by \(3\).

Parth (parthkohli):

Exactly. There are many solutions for that including \(3\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I know all of the definitions of congruence but i still have problem using its rules

Parth (parthkohli):

OK! First things first. Let me give you a pretty good example. Why are ALL integers congruent to 0 OR 1 OR 2 OR 3 (mod 4)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hh because 3,2,1 are smaller than 4 ?

Parth (parthkohli):

Let's think about it this way: ALL integers, when divided by 4, will get remainders just as 0 OR 1 OR 2 OR 3 get when divided by 4.

Parth (parthkohli):

0 gets remainder 0 when divided by 4. 1 gets remainder 1. 2 gets remainder 2. 3 gets remainder 3. So, we mean that the only remainders we can get are 0, 1, 2 or 3. That's true right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i know that the reminder is always smaller than the divedent

Parth (parthkohli):

So what I said is true.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sure it's right

Parth (parthkohli):

Now, what if I said that all the integers are always congruent to 5 OR 6 OR 7 OR 8?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mod what ?

Parth (parthkohli):

mod 4.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes it's right, if you are talking about reminders make sure it's smaller than the dividend

OpenStudy (anonymous):

As i know

Parth (parthkohli):

Great job, what other properties?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what properties :) ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ah greater than 0

Parth (parthkohli):

As you told me, you had trouble understanding congruencies.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes

Parth (parthkohli):

Where?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I didn't understand you which properties are you looking for ?

Parth (parthkohli):

I meant rules. What rules?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ah you mean the rules that i didn't understand?

Parth (parthkohli):

Yes, hehe

OpenStudy (anonymous):

:) let me call it properties as you already said, i think that changing the number by its reminder is kinda, confusing me :)

Parth (parthkohli):

Yup! Well, it's just a step higher than divisibility. You know how if two numbers are equal, they must be divisible by the same number? We're doing this a level higher and comparing the remainders. And we don't need to replace a number by its remainder in congruencies!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[6 \equiv -1[7]\] and \[6\equiv-1[7]\] so \[-1\equiv-1[7]\]

Parth (parthkohli):

Oh? Why are you confused in this?

Parth (parthkohli):

Maybe you are trying to mean something like the following:\[1 \equiv 8 \pmod 7\]and\[8 \equiv 15 \pmod 7\]so\[1 \equiv 15 \pmod 7\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I see this as i replaced the 6 by its reminder by 7, can you change this knowledge from my hand

Parth (parthkohli):

You have to view a congruence relation a little differently. \(a \equiv b \pmod 7\) just means that they both get the same remainder. No replacements. :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes Exactly its the base propertie i guess

Parth (parthkohli):

Hmm... why does it not make sense to you? If a number gets the same remainder as the second number, and the second number gets the same as the third, then all the three get the same remainders.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok i think that i begin understanding the GOAL :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if (a+b+c+d) sum of numbers has the same reminder as 6 when they are divided by 7 can i say that every one of a,b,c has the same reminder when divided by 7

OpenStudy (anonymous):

as 6 sorry

Parth (parthkohli):

Nope! You can't. Let me give you an example. a = 1 b = 2 c = 3 d = 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[1+2+3+0\equiv6[7]\]

Parth (parthkohli):

Yup.

Parth (parthkohli):

But do all of them have the same remainder?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mm Nope

Parth (parthkohli):

So the answer to your question is no.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what about the sum of tow

Parth (parthkohli):

Nope, again! But you must be wondering how \(45x - 28y \equiv 0 \pmod{5}\) implies \(28y \equiv 0 \pmod{5}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mmm it's a multiple of numbers,right ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

because of 45x

Parth (parthkohli):

Exactly! \(45x \equiv 0 \pmod{5}\)

Parth (parthkohli):

Do you see why?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

when you say that i view it as you replacing 0 by 45x

Parth (parthkohli):

Yes, because both of them mean the same in mod 5.

Parth (parthkohli):

But you don't necessarily have to replace it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it's kinda rotation isn't it ?

Parth (parthkohli):

Yup! That's the best way you can think of modular arithmetic.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

numbers wrapping around it self

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ParthKohli I'm really begin understanding the concept :)

Parth (parthkohli):

Yes, you've begun the journey to enlightenment!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ParthKohli I don't know how to thank you enough, so thank you brother

Parth (parthkohli):

I thoroughly enjoyed it! You're welcome, and thank YOU!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and sorry about the very bad english

Parth (parthkohli):

Hehe, I'm not a native speaker either. No problem though! This is about math, not anything else. :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ganeshie8 you are enjoying the discussion i guess :)

Parth (parthkohli):

Haha, he's a good friend.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

yup very much :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok guys thank you

Parth (parthkohli):

I thought you had gone inactive! The fact that you stayed here and listened to us is so appreciable. :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm trying to benefit 100% some people told me that i'm asking people to do my homeworks really my question is kinda homework but used it to start the discussion, i don't care to the solution of the equation because i studied another way to calculate the the solutions :)

Parth (parthkohli):

Haha, you're a rare case on OS. :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I see, really some people they need to put their exercises books right here :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!