Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (nincompoop):

lim

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

\[\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{ 3 }{ n }\left[ \left( \frac{ i }{ n } \right)^{2} +1 \right]\]

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

turn it into a riemann sum noobahz

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

why is the limit even necessary?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the limit is there so that the summation is proper

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

can't put the infinity on top of the sigma and call it a night?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that also works; the limit just makes it more clear how the expression is evaluated (you're not actually summing up infinite terms)

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

I know it works, but the limit seems to serve a very important purpose

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the limit ensures that all the n variables in the expression are equal

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

you mean when doing partitions?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i mean replacing all instances of n in the expression with infinity would not work since the different infinities cannot be considered equal

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

thanks

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Take the interval [0,1], partition it into n equal sub-intervals and evaluate the Riemann sum at right end of each sub-interval for the function 3 x^2 +1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The sum would converge to \[ \int_0^( 3( x^2 +1)dx \] I forget the parenthesis in my previous post

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

now it makes more sense

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

so the limit imposes a very important purpose after all

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

it suggests integration

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[ \int_0^1 3( x^2 +1)dx \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the summation can be evaluated explicitly without integration - it is essentially the sum of squares. although, integration is easiest in this specific case

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

x^3 + x 2 - 0 = 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The final answer is 4

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

is it?

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

my my

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

oh that's right, it's not 3x^2 + 1 lmaoooo

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

thank you both

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

@eliassaab so whenever I see a limit and then sigma notation, I can rewrite it into antiderivative?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No not always. It has to be of the form \[ \sum_i^n (x_{i+1}-x_i) f( c_i) \] Where \[ x_0=a, x_1, x_2, \cdots x_n=b \] is a partition of the interval [a,b] and \[c_i\in[x_i,x_i] \] and f(x) is a continuous function on [a,b] in this case, the above Riemann sum converge to \[ \int_a^b f(x) dx \]

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

okay, because I was wondering how did you figure out the interval to be evaluated

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You will have to find it from the form of the sum

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Of course experience counts

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If you take the 3 out of your sum, you will find

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that 1/n is the length of the sub-intervals. If you take n sub-intervals, n x1/n =1 So the length of the interval is 1 and we are starting from 0, so the interval is [0,1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It is to see that f(x) = 3( x^2 +1)

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

i can see that now

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

thank you once again

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!