Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 8 Online
OpenStudy (austinl):

An infinite, nonconducting sheet has a surface charge density σ = +6.80 pC/m2. (a) How much work is done by the electric field due to the sheet if a particle of charge \(q_0 = 6.41 \times 10^{-19}\) C is moved from the sheet to a point P at distance d = 2.18 cm from the sheet? (b) If the electric potential V is defined to be zero on the sheet, what is V at P?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

so first you have to use Gauss' law to get \(\vec E\), have you got that yet?

OpenStudy (austinl):

Sorry, I made some errors in the LaTeX above. If it is too confusing, you may need to refresh your page... And no, It is \(\large{\Phi=\int \vec E \cdot d\vec A}\) Correct?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

correct... technically a double surface integral, but I know you are overlooking those mathematical details

OpenStudy (turingtest):

have you ever found the E-field due to an infinite plane of charge? any idea what gaussian surface to choose?

OpenStudy (austinl):

For the class that I am in, Calculus III is technically not a prerequisite. I am in it now, but we have not gotten to the multiple integration or differentiation yet. And, I don't believe that I have done that before. But if I had to guess, a cube?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

a cube would work, actually :) usually they call it a "pillbox" (which is kinda like a cylinder) but it actually works fine with any shape that has vertical sides

OpenStudy (austinl):

What is this sorcery that you speak of? Pillbox? I must learn it's ways...

OpenStudy (roadjester):

ROLF @austinL

OpenStudy (roadjester):

oops, spelled that wrong

OpenStudy (turingtest):

|dw:1391726531445:dw|hopefully it's clear that the E-field will be perpendicular to the plane, by symmetry. the "pillbox" looks like this:

OpenStudy (turingtest):

|dw:1391726612737:dw|

OpenStudy (turingtest):

mind you that A need *not* be a circle; it can be any funky shape. YOu will see that A actually drops from the equation, so long as \(\vec A\) is either parallel or antiparallel with \(\vec E\)

OpenStudy (roadjester):

Because it will on be both sides of the equation when you apply Gauss's Law

OpenStudy (austinl):

Okay, I am following along me thinks...

OpenStudy (turingtest):

it will make more sense when you actually do gauss law here and use the form \(\large\frac q{\epsilon_0}=...\)

OpenStudy (roadjester):

Keep in mind that, based on @TuringTest 's drawing, you have to double the E-field since the gaussian surface is both above and below the plane of charge

OpenStudy (austinl):

I'm sorry, my brain is experiencing the mid-afternoon fuzzies... I am afraid I am having some difficulty grasping this.

OpenStudy (roadjester):

\[\huge \phi_e = 2EA = {\sigma A \over \epsilon_0 }\] \[\huge \phi_e\] is the electric flux and the charge enclosed is the area A times the surface charge density sigma

OpenStudy (austinl):

But... the area is on an infinite sheet...

OpenStudy (turingtest):

but we only need consider the area that has *enclosed* charge in it

OpenStudy (turingtest):

|dw:1391727520271:dw|what is the charge on this part of the sheet? (no, I don't want a numerical answer, in symbols please)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!