∫ (x+4)/(x^2 +2x+5) dx
Can you factor the bottom at all?
no, it has no real zeros
so would you have to divide x+4 by the denominator?
i would complete the square on the bottom, then use a trig sub, that might work
you cant use partial fractions because the denominator has not real roots, unless you want to be fancy and use partial fractions with complex numbers i would not go that route
yeah thats where i got stuck...
denominator can be written as \((x+1)^2+4\) which looks very much like \(u^2+a^2\) with \(u=x+1,b=2\)
ok so, let's make that bottom into something we can use
set up for arctangent
ok can you go through how you got to arctangent...
So, take a look at the bottom. We want to factor that into something we can use. Start by completing the square
\[\int\frac{du}{u^2+a^2}=\frac{1}{a}\tan^{-1}(\frac{u}{a})\]
break in to two parts use a u-sub for the first part, and arctangent for the second
@FibonacciChick666 you can message me now i think it is ok once you use a gimmick, as all of these require a gimmick of some sort
if it was \[\int\frac{x+1}{x^2+2x+5}dx\]you could use a simple u - sub \(u=x^2+2x+5, du =(2x+2)dx,\frac{1}{2}du=(x+1)dx\) etc then it would be easy
since it is not \[\int\frac{x+1}{x^2+2x+5}dx\] but rather \[\int\frac{x+4}{x^2+2x+5}dx\] gimmick is to break in to two parts \[\int\frac{x+1}{x^2+2x+5}dx+\int\frac{3}{x^2+2x+5}dx\]
first is the simple u - sub as above, you can pretty much do it in your head second is the complete the square get the arctangent part
ok so after you manipulate it with the trig sub, would you eventually get to something like 1/2∫x+4 ?
not quite.
ok where did I go wrong, i had the denominator being 4(sec^x), and that canceled out with the du = 2 (secx)^2.
It's not a substitution in the form that you are thinking. it is just making it look like something we know how to integrate
ok so how would that look like...
Alright let's walk through step by step. Now, as noted by satelite above, the bottom turns into a pretty \((x+1)^2+4\)
We want to make the top of our fraction something we can use.
So notice that when we make our denominator pretty, it almost looks like a special case we know
Do you see what I'm referring to?
ummm maybe.... i know that u^2 +a^2 allows you to use trig sub, but apparently that was wrong...
ok, so what is the derivative of \(\frac{1}{a}tan^{-1}(\frac{u}{a})\)
1/1+a^2 ?
Why 1?
would it be u?
Can you tell me why? or cite your source?
i just remember that the derivative of arctan is 1/1+x^2
That would be inverse tan of x, I'm asking inverse tan of x/a
1/((x/a)^2 +1) ?
Take a look up top at satelite's answer wayyyy up there
so a u sub for the 1/u, and then the derivative of arctan(u/a) ?
can you write that out for me.
well l/u is the ln|u| right?
no, you're thinking too far ahead
just rewrite, the integral for me
∫(x+4)/(u^2 +4)
ok, so not quite. You are going to have \[\int \frac{x+4}{(x+1)^2+4} dx\] Dp you see how I got that?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!