MEDAL AND FAN Justify if completing the square is a good method for solving when the Discriminant is negative. Use any of your three functions as an example and respond in complete sentences. f(x) = x^2 - 4 g(x) = x^2 + 6x + 3 h(x) = x^2 + 2
I have a similar question, I do not know if you can complete the square with only two terms?
You can in at least some cases. But if there's a better method then it would be a waste of time to attempt completing the square. Using f(x) as an example, I notice that's also a difference of squares, so I wouldn't complete the square there.
Can I use that as my answer?
For f(x), sure, but you'd have to continue to explain why it's more efficient. Your reasoning for h(x) and g(x) can't be the same, though.
Where do negative discriminants come into play? I don't get that.
h(x) is actually supposed to be h(x) = x^2 + 3x + 6
I'd complete the square for that one.
the square is "completed" already on two terms, complete the square means get it into the form of (x+a)^2+b, and you have this already with x^2+2 x^2+2 = (x+0)^2+2 so its already in vertex form....no need to do anything, just set equal to 0 and solve, if you are trying to find solutions.
I don't know what my answer should be :/ lol
@mathmale Hey could you help me?
I'd be glad to. Which problem would you like to focus on?
@mathmale Sorry, I fell asleep. Could we try h(x) = x^2 + 3x + 6?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!