Statistics 2.34 - 2.35
For problem 2.54 I got 2/5 3/5 3/5 5/5 and 0/5 for the second problem I dont know how to do it
any1?
I'd be interested in hearing about your reasoning in arriving at these results for Problem 2.54, especially for P(A). P(A OR B) does seem to be P(A) + P(B) = 1, because that exhausts the entire sample space. I agree with your response to P(A AND B). A and B have no overlap, and thus the probability of them happening together is zero. Regarding 2.35:
First of all, there are 5 possible outcomes making up the sample space: {a,b,c,d,e}, and their respective (unequal) probabilities are given. Add up these probabilities. What do you get? What do you conclude on the basis of this result?
Ive been trying for the past 20 minutes and I got for each respectively 0.4 0.8 0.6 1.0 0.2 for problem 2.55 Are you saying my 2.54 is correct?
I agree with 3 of your 5 responses to 2.34; I was hoping you'd explain your reasoning in calculating the probability of Event A: P(A). Also, we need to come to agreement on what {a,b,c} means in this context. Does it mean that outcomes a, b and c occur simultaneously? What is your interpretation? If we know the individual probabilities of outcomes a, b and c, how do we use that info to come up with the probability of Event A: P(A) = P({a,b,c})? I don't pretend that I know the answer to that particular question.
P(A) so there is a and b out of a , b, c, d, e so that must mean 2/5?
Your best bet is to review your instructional material, in search for examples of just what Event A: {a,b,c} means.
you talking about 2.54 or 2.55?
More recently, about 2.55.
oh, ok.. But for 2.54 I thought they all were correct?
you said only 3 of 5 I have correct?
P(A) would have to be 2/5 rigt? so P(B) would be 3/5? and shouldn't P(A') be the same as P(A)?
Elvis, I didn't say that. I'm not comfortable just saying "correct" or "incorrect;" I'd prefer to hear about and understand your reasoning before responding. My agreement with 3 of 5 of your responses does not necessarily mean that the other 2 are incorrect; it means that I myself am unsure and therefore wanted to know your reasoning, as well as to know about any examples that you might find in your instructional material.
cool Im happy to hear that because some people just state answers
and dont really help me
Same here. I'd much prefer not to deal in answers alone.
How do I add you as a friend or something? there is a really hard question I asked about statistics that people havent really explained well and Im just stuck on with an answer I dont know how to get
It may be helpful to look at the example of tossing a single die. There are 6 possible outcomes: {1,2,3,4,5,6}. Each outcome is equally likely and has probability 1/6. Now let me throw you a trick question. What is the probability of Event Z: {1,3}? Suppose you only make one toss. Then change the rules and suppose you make 2 tosses. What would be the probabilities that you'd expect?
2.55?
i thought we consider c as one outcome? because its both in A and B
My latest post actually applies to both 2.54 and 2.55. I'm picking your brain as well as mine to come to an understanding of what {1,3} or {a,c} would mean in this context.
why six outcomes? there is only abcde or 5
oh nevermind lol i see u have confused me a little
Back to that example of tossing a die ONCE: Could we end up with event {1,3}? Remember, I'm talking about an example; my example has 6 possible outcomes, whereas 2.55 has 5. Tossing a die is, I'd assume, more familiar to you than is some event such as E:{a,b,c}.
yes
so 2/6?
I find it very useful to revert to easier examples when I don't understand something well or one of my students doesn't. But look: Suppose we toss the die just once. Could we obtain the result {1,3}?
if we toss it twice
Right. But I'm restricting both of to tossing it only once. So, could we, on one toss, obtain {1,3}?
no
My point exactly. Now supposing we toss the same die twice, each time recording the (single) outcome. Could we conceivably get {1,3}?
yes first possibility is 1/6 second is 1/5
total 1/30
But each toss is INDEPENDENT, and this is a case of "drawing a card WITH REPLACEMENT." Thus, your second toss is completely independent of your first toss, isn't it?
ohhhhh i forgot
In other words, the probabilities don't change. The probability of getting a digit between 1 and 6 inclusive is 1/6 for {1,2,3,4,5,6}.
oh ok
My first guess (note that I've used the word "guess") is that IF one die is thrown twice and the (single) outcome recorded each time, and the probability of any outcome in {a,b,c,d,e,f} is 1/6, the probability of obtaining {1,3} is (1/6)(1/6). Explain why this makes sense (or does not make sense) to you.
Note that I'm multiplying probabilities, not adding them (as you have tried, a few comments earlier). Why multiply instead of add?
because although you obatin a 1 on the first roll doesnt rule out it can be rolled the se3cond
Right; the first roll has no effect whatsoever on the 2nd roll.
is that what my question is saying for 5.54?
I don't know yet. I've explained that you and I need to work together to come to an understanding of what {a,b,c} actually means.
oh ok...istill believe the answer is 2/5 though
for P(A)
5.54
Supposing that in 2.54, a, b, c, d and e are lying in a bowl. You cover your eyes and pick one of them out. The probability of getting a on the first pick is 1/5, right? Now we have to decide whether we replace that a or do not replace it. If we replace it, the probability of obtaining b on the next pick is 1/5. If we do not replace it, but the first pick produced an a, then the prob. of obtaining b on the next pick is 1/4.
oh ok.. so the answer is then 1/5 x 1/4? i thought it was a simple 2/5
so P(B) is 1/5 x 1/4 x 1/3 or 1/60?
I cannot do this problem without examining the possibilities here and then making assumptions. That's why I've been asking you to look for examples of this kind of problem in the instructional material available to you, whether it be textbook, class handouts, etc. Elvis: Please remember that whether the "answer" is correct or not depends upon our assumptions. Unless you tell me what you're assuming, I can't tell you whether or not your reasoning is correct or not. If you tell me that P(B) is (1/5)(1/4)(1/3), then I automatically assume that you are drawing from the bowl WITHOUT REPLACEMENT and that each time, you got what you wanted (a or b or c).
Please list whatever reference material you may have available to you right now. Do you have a texbook or something the teacher wrote for your study? Are there examples on the teacher's website?
yes ill try
If you're not under pressure of time to complete this assignment, I'd suggest you e-mail your teacher listing the assumptions you/ we / I are making and asking for feedback in regard to whether those assumptions are legitimate or not. I'm sure you want to get this problem done and done correctly, but this kind of problem really ca n't be rushed through.
http://www.acc.umu.se/~marshi/Courses/Kvalitetsteknik%20och%20forsoksplanering/Uppgifter/Uppgift10_42/0470053046Applied%20Statistics%20and%20Probability%20for%20Engineers%20B.pdf This is basically the textbook Im using I am on page 35
I've clicked on your link and am redirected to the new URL, but so far the textbook has not downloaded onto my computer. In the meanteime, would you mind going back to that tough question from earlier (not 2.54 or 2.55)? Perhaps we could together solve it to your satisfaction.
ok definitely
Plastic parts produced by an injection-molding operation are checked for conformance to specifications. Each tool contains 12 cavities in which parts are produced, and these parts fall into a conveyor when the press opens. An inspector chooses 3 parts from among the 12 at random. Two cavities are affected by a temperature malfunction that results in parts that don't conform to specifications. a) what is the probability that the inspector finds exactly one nonconforming part? b) what is the probability that the inspector finds at least one nonconforming part?
an answer on yahoo said that there are 12C3 = 220 ways for the inspector to pick 3 parts to check. When exactly one of these three is bad: there are 2 ways to pick the bad part and 10C2 = 45 ways to pick good parts. 2*45/220 = 9/22 b) the probability that the inspector checks only good parts is 10C3/12C3 = 120/220 = 6/11 therefore the probability that he finds at least one bad is 1 - 6/11 = 5/11 I reaally dontunderstand the reasoning for using 10 instead of 12 in the combinaations
Before I go into that "10 VS 12": are you familiar with binomial probability? And, if so, have you considered that this problem might be solvable using binomial probability?
i dont know what 10 VS 12 means
You wanted to know "the reasoning for using 10 instead of 12 in the combinaations"
yes
Here are my thots: there are 12 cavities in the mold. 2 of them aren't quite right, so might produce defective parts. Therefore, according to my reasoning, the chances that the inspector will pick a defective part at random from the 12 from the mold is 2/12, or 1/6. I need to know whether or not this makes sense to you.
yeah thats what I thought
OK, at first glance this really does seem to be a problem in binomial probability. the probability of "success" (which is that a part drawn at random is defective) is 1/6. There are 12 parts to choose from. What is the prob. that the inspector picks exactly 1 defectgive part? If you have a TI-84 calculator, the proper command for calc. this prob. would be binompdf(12,1/6,1). Are you familiar with that, and does this make sense to you?
I do not have a calculator or a table of binom. prob. with me, unfort.
i have a calculator dont know how to use it for these questions
but the trick to the questio is the inspector must pick 3 parts at once where one is defective
Whoa. The problem statement says that the inspector chooses 3 parts from the 12. I'd say the chances that one of these is defective is still 1/6; would you? Then n=3, prob. = 1/6, and x = 1 I assume you're calc. binom. prob. with the formula that involves nCr; am I correct?
yes
OK, then: so you'd be calculating 3C1 (1/6)^1(1-1/6)^(3-1). Up for that?
I am but I am not sure what that means
That's the formula for calculating binomial probability when n=3, p = 1/6 and x = 1.
oh ok
I trust you know how to calculate that. 3C1 = (3!)/[1!(3-1)!] = 1/2, unless I'm sorely mistaken.
3C1 is 2 that times 1/6 equals 1/3
i mwan 3
3C1 is 3
right?
I get (3)(1/6)^1*(5/6)^(3-1). Compare. Agreed or not? Elvis, I feel bad about this but do need to get off my comp. If you'd like to complete our discussion, you may do so either thru openstudy or thru e-mail (wrgnsc@rit.edu).
Yes, I evaluate 3C1 as 3.
ok ill email you abput this and other things
when will you be available to discuss?
I believe the correct result is 1/72, but that depends upon wehther your/my/our assumptions are correct. Great working with you! Best to e-mail me; then I can respond immed. when available again, and/or set up a specific time to work on OpenStudy.
ok thanks
Cool. Over and out!
I've glanced through a few sections of your online prob/stat textbook. There's a section where this book compares binomial and hypergeometric probabilities. Somehow I'm not comfortable with my own suggestion that if the probability of getting a non-conforming result is 1/6, then the same probability applies to the case where 12 moldings are made but only 3 of those 12 are chosen. Although I've tried solving a few problems involving hypergeometric probability in the past, I am by no means an expert at it. Either we'll both have to read up on hypergeom. prob.., or you'll need to ask through OpenStudy for someone familiar with this sub-topic.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!